PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RSBT vs. RSSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RSBT vs. RSSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Return Stacked Bonds & Managed Futures ETF (RSBT) and Return Stacked U.S. Stocks & Gold/Bitcoin ETF (RSSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RSBT achieves a 10.49% return, which is significantly higher than RSSX's 1.26% return.


RSBT

1D
-0.15%
1M
3.56%
YTD
10.49%
6M
12.19%
1Y
28.83%
3Y*
4.98%
5Y*
10Y*

RSSX

1D
-2.19%
1M
-3.05%
YTD
1.26%
6M
0.73%
1Y
28.58%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RSBT vs. RSSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between RSBT and RSSX is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.58

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 2, 2025

0.58

The correlation between RSBT and RSSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RSBT vs. RSSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RSBT
RSBT Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
RSBT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RSBT Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
RSBT Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
RSBT Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
RSBT Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

RSSX
RSSX Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
RSSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RSSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
RSSX Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
RSSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
RSSX Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RSBT vs. RSSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Return Stacked Bonds & Managed Futures ETF (RSBT) and Return Stacked U.S. Stocks & Gold/Bitcoin ETF (RSSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RSBTRSSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.35

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.17

+0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.58

1.05

+3.53

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.25

3.02

+9.23

RSBT vs. RSSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RSBT Sharpe Ratio is 2.07, which is higher than the RSSX Sharpe Ratio of 0.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RSBT and RSSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RSBTRSSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.07

0.90

+1.17

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.09

0.99

-0.89

Drawdowns

RSBT vs. RSSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RSBT drawdown since its inception was -23.60%, smaller than the maximum RSSX drawdown of -27.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSBT and RSSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RSBTRSSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.60%

-27.37%

+3.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.33%

-27.37%

+21.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.15%

-15.42%

+15.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.64%

-6.72%

-5.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.36%

9.49%

-7.13%

Volatility

RSBT vs. RSSX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Return Stacked Bonds & Managed Futures ETF (RSBT) is 3.10%, while Return Stacked U.S. Stocks & Gold/Bitcoin ETF (RSSX) has a volatility of 7.93%. This indicates that RSBT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RSSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RSBTRSSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.10%

7.93%

-4.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.97%

26.82%

-16.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.99%

31.81%

-17.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.68%

31.80%

-18.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.68%

31.80%

-18.12%

RSBT vs. RSSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RSBT has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than RSSX's 0.68% expense ratio.


Dividends

RSBT vs. RSSX - Dividend Comparison

RSBT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.90%, more than RSSX's 1.52% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
RSBT
Return Stacked Bonds & Managed Futures ETF
2.90%3.20%0.00%2.38%
RSSX
Return Stacked U.S. Stocks & Gold/Bitcoin ETF
1.52%1.54%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


RSBT and RSSX have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RSSX has higher volatility (7.93%) compared to RSBT (3.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSBT dropped -23.60% vs RSSX's -27.37%.

On 1-year performance, RSBT leads with 28.83% vs 28.58% for RSSX. On fees, RSSX is cheaper at 0.68% per year. On volatility, RSBT has been the lower-risk option at 3.10%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, RSBT has performed better with a 28.83% return vs 28.58%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

RSSX is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for RSBT.

RSBT has the higher dividend yield at 2.90%, compared with 1.52% for RSSX.

RSBT is categorized as Nontraditional Bonds, while RSSX is Diversified Portfolio. Their fees differ too: 0.97% for RSBT and 0.68% for RSSX.

RSBT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.07 vs 0.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RSBT and RSSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer