RSBT vs. RSSX
RSBT (Return Stacked Bonds & Managed Futures ETF) and RSSX (Return Stacked U.S. Stocks & Gold/Bitcoin ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RSBT is a Nontraditional Bonds fund actively managed by Return Stacked, while RSSX is a Diversified Portfolio fund actively managed by Return Stacked. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, RSBT returned 28.83% vs 28.58% for RSSX. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RSBT charges 0.97%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for RSSX.
Performance
RSBT vs. RSSX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RSBT achieves a 10.49% return, which is significantly higher than RSSX's 1.26% return.
RSBT
- 1D
- -0.15%
- 1M
- 3.56%
- YTD
- 10.49%
- 6M
- 12.19%
- 1Y
- 28.83%
- 3Y*
- 4.98%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RSSX
- 1D
- -2.19%
- 1M
- -3.05%
- YTD
- 1.26%
- 6M
- 0.73%
- 1Y
- 28.58%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RSBT vs. RSSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
RSBT Return Stacked Bonds & Managed Futures ETF | 10.49% | 16.71% |
RSSX Return Stacked U.S. Stocks & Gold/Bitcoin ETF | 1.26% | 29.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between RSBT and RSSX is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 2, 2025 | 0.58 |
The correlation between RSBT and RSSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RSBT vs. RSSX — Risk / Return Rank
RSBT
RSSX
RSBT vs. RSSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Return Stacked Bonds & Managed Futures ETF (RSBT) and Return Stacked U.S. Stocks & Gold/Bitcoin ETF (RSSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RSBT | RSSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.35 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.17 | +0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.58 | 1.05 | +3.53 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.25 | 3.02 | +9.23 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RSBT | RSSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.07 | 0.90 | +1.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.09 | 0.99 | -0.89 |
Drawdowns
RSBT vs. RSSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RSBT drawdown since its inception was -23.60%, smaller than the maximum RSSX drawdown of -27.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSBT and RSSX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RSBT | RSSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.60% | -27.37% | +3.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.33% | -27.37% | +21.04% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.98% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.15% | -15.42% | +15.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.64% | -6.72% | -5.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.36% | 9.49% | -7.13% |
Volatility
RSBT vs. RSSX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Return Stacked Bonds & Managed Futures ETF (RSBT) is 3.10%, while Return Stacked U.S. Stocks & Gold/Bitcoin ETF (RSSX) has a volatility of 7.93%. This indicates that RSBT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RSSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RSBT | RSSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.10% | 7.93% | -4.83% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.97% | 26.82% | -16.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.99% | 31.81% | -17.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.68% | 31.80% | -18.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.68% | 31.80% | -18.12% |
RSBT vs. RSSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
RSBT has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than RSSX's 0.68% expense ratio.
Dividends
RSBT vs. RSSX - Dividend Comparison
RSBT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.90%, more than RSSX's 1.52% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
RSBT Return Stacked Bonds & Managed Futures ETF | 2.90% | 3.20% | 0.00% | 2.38% |
RSSX Return Stacked U.S. Stocks & Gold/Bitcoin ETF | 1.52% | 1.54% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RSBT and RSSX have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RSSX has higher volatility (7.93%) compared to RSBT (3.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSBT dropped -23.60% vs RSSX's -27.37%.
On 1-year performance, RSBT leads with 28.83% vs 28.58% for RSSX. On fees, RSSX is cheaper at 0.68% per year. On volatility, RSBT has been the lower-risk option at 3.10%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, RSBT has performed better with a 28.83% return vs 28.58%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
RSSX is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for RSBT.
RSBT has the higher dividend yield at 2.90%, compared with 1.52% for RSSX.
RSBT is categorized as Nontraditional Bonds, while RSSX is Diversified Portfolio. Their fees differ too: 0.97% for RSBT and 0.68% for RSSX.
RSBT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.07 vs 0.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RSBT and RSSX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer