RSBT vs. RMDFX
Compare and contrast key facts about Return Stacked Bonds & Managed Futures ETF (RSBT) and Aspiriant Defensive Allocation Fund (RMDFX).
RSBT is an actively managed fund by Return Stacked. It was launched on Feb 7, 2023. RMDFX is managed by Aspiriant. It was launched on Dec 13, 2015.
Performance
RSBT vs. RMDFX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RSBT vs. RMDFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
RSBT Return Stacked Bonds & Managed Futures ETF | 5.19% | 10.31% | -2.90% | -11.91% |
RMDFX Aspiriant Defensive Allocation Fund | 2.53% | 18.85% | 1.45% | 6.19% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RSBT achieves a 5.19% return, which is significantly higher than RMDFX's 2.53% return.
RSBT
- 1D
- 0.37%
- 1M
- -4.56%
- YTD
- 5.19%
- 6M
- 11.52%
- 1Y
- 14.67%
- 3Y*
- 2.90%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RMDFX
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- -3.79%
- YTD
- 2.53%
- 6M
- 7.56%
- 1Y
- 17.15%
- 3Y*
- 9.46%
- 5Y*
- 5.23%
- 10Y*
- 4.91%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RSBT vs. RMDFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
RSBT has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than RMDFX's 0.18% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
RSBT vs. RMDFX — Risk / Return Rank
RSBT
RMDFX
RSBT vs. RMDFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Return Stacked Bonds & Managed Futures ETF (RSBT) and Aspiriant Defensive Allocation Fund (RMDFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RSBT | RMDFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.99 | 3.47 | -2.48 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.35 | 4.74 | -3.39 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.75 | -0.57 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.72 | 4.07 | -2.35 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.77 | 17.19 | -13.42 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RSBT | RMDFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.99 | 3.47 | -2.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.83 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.79 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.02 | 0.78 | -0.79 |
Correlation
The correlation between RSBT and RMDFX is 0.48, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
RSBT vs. RMDFX - Dividend Comparison
RSBT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.04%, less than RMDFX's 4.52% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RSBT Return Stacked Bonds & Managed Futures ETF | 3.04% | 3.20% | 0.00% | 2.38% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RMDFX Aspiriant Defensive Allocation Fund | 4.52% | 4.63% | 0.00% | 3.69% | 0.78% | 5.37% | 2.28% | 3.78% | 4.11% | 2.16% | 1.16% |
Drawdowns
RSBT vs. RMDFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RSBT drawdown since its inception was -23.60%, which is greater than RMDFX's maximum drawdown of -15.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSBT and RMDFX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RSBT | RMDFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.60% | -15.96% | -7.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.17% | -4.19% | -3.98% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -14.63% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -15.96% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.56% | -3.79% | -0.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.22% | -3.37% | -9.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.04% | 0.99% | +3.05% |
Volatility
RSBT vs. RMDFX - Volatility Comparison
Return Stacked Bonds & Managed Futures ETF (RSBT) has a higher volatility of 3.95% compared to Aspiriant Defensive Allocation Fund (RMDFX) at 1.99%. This indicates that RSBT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RMDFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RSBT | RMDFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.95% | 1.99% | +1.96% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.28% | 3.83% | +7.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.95% | 5.01% | +9.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.90% | 6.34% | +7.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.90% | 6.20% | +7.70% |