PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RSBT vs. RISR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RSBT vs. RISR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Return Stacked Bonds & Managed Futures ETF (RSBT) and FolioBeyond Alternative Income and Interest Rate Hedge ETF (RISR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RSBT achieves a 10.49% return, which is significantly higher than RISR's 2.78% return.


RSBT

1D
-0.15%
1M
3.56%
YTD
10.49%
6M
12.19%
1Y
28.83%
3Y*
4.98%
5Y*
10Y*

RISR

1D
0.14%
1M
-0.44%
YTD
2.78%
6M
3.60%
1Y
4.20%
3Y*
10.78%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RSBT vs. RISR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
RSBT
Return Stacked Bonds & Managed Futures ETF
10.49%10.31%-2.90%-11.91%
RISR
FolioBeyond Alternative Income and Interest Rate Hedge ETF
2.78%4.63%24.20%8.17%

Correlation

The correlation between RSBT and RISR is -0.23, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.23

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.19

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 9, 2023

-0.18

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RSBT vs. RISR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RSBT
RSBT Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
RSBT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RSBT Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
RSBT Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
RSBT Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
RSBT Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

RISR
RISR Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
RISR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RISR Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
RISR Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
RISR Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
RISR Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RSBT vs. RISR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Return Stacked Bonds & Managed Futures ETF (RSBT) and FolioBeyond Alternative Income and Interest Rate Hedge ETF (RISR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RSBTRISRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.56

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.14

+0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.58

1.62

+2.96

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.25

3.81

+8.44

RSBT vs. RISR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RSBT Sharpe Ratio is 2.07, which is higher than the RISR Sharpe Ratio of 0.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RSBT and RISR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RSBTRISRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.07

0.78

+1.29

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.09

1.24

-1.14

Drawdowns

RSBT vs. RISR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RSBT drawdown since its inception was -23.60%, which is greater than RISR's maximum drawdown of -14.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSBT and RISR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RSBTRISRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.60%

-14.31%

-9.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.33%

-2.61%

-3.72%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.98%

-8.07%

-10.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.15%

-0.71%

+0.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.64%

-2.19%

-10.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.36%

1.11%

+1.25%

Volatility

RSBT vs. RISR - Volatility Comparison

Return Stacked Bonds & Managed Futures ETF (RSBT) has a higher volatility of 3.10% compared to FolioBeyond Alternative Income and Interest Rate Hedge ETF (RISR) at 1.27%. This indicates that RSBT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RISR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RSBTRISRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.10%

1.27%

+1.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.97%

4.09%

+5.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.99%

5.44%

+8.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.68%

11.85%

+1.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.68%

11.85%

+1.83%

RSBT vs. RISR - Expense Ratio Comparison

RSBT has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is lower than RISR's 1.13% expense ratio.


Dividends

RSBT vs. RISR - Dividend Comparison

RSBT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.90%, less than RISR's 5.93% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
RISR
FolioBeyond Alternative Income and Interest Rate Hedge ETF
5.93%5.95%5.67%7.96%4.26%0.30%
RSBT
Return Stacked Bonds & Managed Futures ETF
2.90%3.20%0.00%2.38%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


RSBT and RISR have a correlation of -0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RSBT has higher volatility (3.10%) compared to RISR (1.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSBT dropped -23.60% vs RISR's -14.31%.

On 3-year performance, RISR leads with 10.78% vs 4.98% for RSBT. On fees, RSBT is cheaper at 0.97% per year. On volatility, RISR has been the lower-risk option at 1.27%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, RISR has performed better with a 10.78% return vs 4.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

RSBT is cheaper with a 0.97% expense ratio, compared with 1.13% for RISR.

RISR has the higher dividend yield at 5.93%, compared with 2.90% for RSBT.

They also come from different issuers: Return Stacked and FolioBeyond. Their fees differ too: 0.97% for RSBT and 1.13% for RISR.

RSBT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.07 vs 0.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RSBT and RISR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer