RSBT vs. IBTF
RSBT (Return Stacked Bonds & Managed Futures ETF) and IBTF (iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Treasury ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RSBT is a Nontraditional Bonds fund actively managed by Return Stacked, while IBTF is a Government Bonds fund tracking the ICE 2025 Maturity US Treasury Index. RSBT is actively managed, while IBTF is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, RSBT returned 4.98%/yr vs 3.66%/yr for IBTF. At a correlation of -0.03, they often move in opposite directions. RSBT charges 0.97%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for IBTF.
Performance
RSBT vs. IBTF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
RSBT
- 1D
- -0.15%
- 1M
- 3.56%
- YTD
- 10.49%
- 6M
- 12.19%
- 1Y
- 28.83%
- 3Y*
- 4.98%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IBTF
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 0.00%
- 6M
- 0.09%
- 1Y
- 2.14%
- 3Y*
- 3.66%
- 5Y*
- 0.90%
- 10Y*
- —
RSBT vs. IBTF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
RSBT Return Stacked Bonds & Managed Futures ETF | 10.49% | 10.31% | -2.90% | -11.91% |
IBTF iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Treasury ETF | 0.00% | 3.81% | 4.60% | 3.55% |
Correlation
The correlation between RSBT and IBTF is -0.12, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.12 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.07 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 9, 2023 | -0.03 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RSBT vs. IBTF — Risk / Return Rank
RSBT
IBTF
RSBT vs. IBTF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Return Stacked Bonds & Managed Futures ETF (RSBT) and iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Treasury ETF (IBTF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RSBT | IBTF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -5.00 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -17.38 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 6.23 | -4.85 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.58 | 59.41 | -54.83 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.25 | 269.70 | -257.45 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RSBT | IBTF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.07 | 7.08 | -5.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.39 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.09 | 0.44 | -0.35 |
Drawdowns
RSBT vs. IBTF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RSBT drawdown since its inception was -23.60%, which is greater than IBTF's maximum drawdown of -10.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSBT and IBTF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RSBT | IBTF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.60% | -10.45% | -13.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.33% | -0.04% | -6.29% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.98% | -0.67% | -18.31% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -9.53% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.15% | 0.00% | -0.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.64% | -3.33% | -9.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.36% | 0.01% | +2.35% |
Volatility
RSBT vs. IBTF - Volatility Comparison
Return Stacked Bonds & Managed Futures ETF (RSBT) has a higher volatility of 3.10% compared to iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Treasury ETF (IBTF) at 0.00%. This indicates that RSBT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBTF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RSBT | IBTF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.10% | 0.00% | +3.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.97% | 0.19% | +9.78% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.99% | 0.36% | +13.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.68% | 2.38% | +11.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.68% | 2.56% | +11.12% |
RSBT vs. IBTF - Expense Ratio Comparison
RSBT has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than IBTF's 0.07% expense ratio.
Dividends
RSBT vs. IBTF - Dividend Comparison
RSBT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.90%, more than IBTF's 2.08% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBTF iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Treasury ETF | 2.08% | 3.83% | 4.32% | 4.03% | 1.93% | 0.57% | 0.59% |
RSBT Return Stacked Bonds & Managed Futures ETF | 2.90% | 3.20% | 0.00% | 2.38% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RSBT and IBTF have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RSBT has higher volatility (3.10%) compared to IBTF (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSBT dropped -23.60% vs IBTF's -10.45%.
On 3-year performance, RSBT leads with 4.98% vs 3.66% for IBTF. On fees, IBTF is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, IBTF has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, RSBT has performed better with a 4.98% return vs 3.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IBTF is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for RSBT.
RSBT has the higher dividend yield at 2.90%, compared with 2.08% for IBTF.
RSBT is categorized as Nontraditional Bonds, while IBTF is Government Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Return Stacked and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.97% for RSBT and 0.07% for IBTF.
IBTF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (7.08 vs 2.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RSBT and IBTF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer