RQFI.DE vs. XCS7.DE
RQFI.DE (Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 UCITS ETF 1D) and XCS7.DE (Xtrackers MSCI China UCITS ETF 1D) are both China Equities funds from Xtrackers - RQFI.DE tracks the MSCI China A Onshore NR CNY while XCS7.DE tracks the MSCI China. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, RQFI.DE returned 9.38%/yr vs 7.69%/yr for XCS7.DE. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RQFI.DE charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.28%/yr for XCS7.DE.
Performance
RQFI.DE vs. XCS7.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RQFI.DE achieves a 10.42% return, which is significantly higher than XCS7.DE's -6.89% return.
RQFI.DE
- 1D
- -0.67%
- 1M
- 1.50%
- YTD
- 10.42%
- 6M
- 12.27%
- 1Y
- 34.46%
- 3Y*
- 9.38%
- 5Y*
- -0.26%
- 10Y*
- 5.34%
XCS7.DE
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- -3.41%
- YTD
- -6.89%
- 6M
- -9.34%
- 1Y
- 2.51%
- 3Y*
- 7.69%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RQFI.DE vs. XCS7.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RQFI.DE Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 UCITS ETF 1D | 10.42% | 11.14% | 22.25% | -16.68% | -0.36% |
XCS7.DE Xtrackers MSCI China UCITS ETF 1D | -6.89% | 16.53% | 27.49% | -14.73% | 4.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between RQFI.DE and XCS7.DE is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 27, 2022 | 0.73 |
The correlation between RQFI.DE and XCS7.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.63 (1 year) to 0.73 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RQFI.DE vs. XCS7.DE — Risk / Return Rank
RQFI.DE
XCS7.DE
RQFI.DE vs. XCS7.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 UCITS ETF 1D (RQFI.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI China UCITS ETF 1D (XCS7.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RQFI.DE | XCS7.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.74 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.04 | +0.35 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.91 | 0.16 | +5.75 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.55 | 0.34 | +15.21 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RQFI.DE | XCS7.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.23 | 0.15 | +2.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.01 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.24 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.31 | 0.20 | +0.11 |
Drawdowns
RQFI.DE vs. XCS7.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RQFI.DE drawdown since its inception was -51.79%, which is greater than XCS7.DE's maximum drawdown of -36.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RQFI.DE and XCS7.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RQFI.DE | XCS7.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.79% | -36.62% | -15.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.82% | -17.01% | +11.19% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.48% | -24.53% | -2.95% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -41.44% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.24% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.80% | -14.97% | +3.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -27.06% | -15.59% | -11.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.21% | 8.18% | -5.97% |
Volatility
RQFI.DE vs. XCS7.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 UCITS ETF 1D (RQFI.DE) is 5.89%, while Xtrackers MSCI China UCITS ETF 1D (XCS7.DE) has a volatility of 7.33%. This indicates that RQFI.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XCS7.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RQFI.DE | XCS7.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.89% | 7.33% | -1.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.42% | 13.19% | -2.77% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.40% | 18.48% | -3.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.96% | 25.65% | -4.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.82% | 25.65% | -3.83% |
RQFI.DE vs. XCS7.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
RQFI.DE has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than XCS7.DE's 0.28% expense ratio.
Dividends
RQFI.DE vs. XCS7.DE - Dividend Comparison
RQFI.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.44%, less than XCS7.DE's 2.11% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RQFI.DE Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 UCITS ETF 1D | 1.44% | 1.84% | 1.40% | 1.98% | 1.97% | 0.90% | 1.32% | 0.75% | 2.31% | 2.00% | 1.81% | 0.37% |
XCS7.DE Xtrackers MSCI China UCITS ETF 1D | 2.11% | 2.35% | 2.05% | 3.49% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RQFI.DE and XCS7.DE have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XCS7.DE is cheaper at 0.28% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XCS7.DE is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for RQFI.DE.
RQFI.DE tracks MSCI China A Onshore NR CNY, while XCS7.DE tracks MSCI China. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for RQFI.DE and 0.28% for XCS7.DE.
Find the right allocation for RQFI.DE and XCS7.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer