RQFI.DE vs. H4Z6.DE
Compare and contrast key facts about Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 UCITS ETF 1D (RQFI.DE) and HSBC MSCI China UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (H4Z6.DE).
RQFI.DE and H4Z6.DE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. RQFI.DE is a passively managed fund by Xtrackers that tracks the performance of the MSCI China A Onshore NR CNY. It was launched on Jan 8, 2014. H4Z6.DE is a passively managed fund by HSBC that tracks the performance of the MSCI China. It was launched on Jul 12, 2022. Both RQFI.DE and H4Z6.DE are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
RQFI.DE vs. H4Z6.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RQFI.DE vs. H4Z6.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RQFI.DE Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 UCITS ETF 1D | 0.32% | 11.14% | 22.25% | -16.68% | -14.00% |
H4Z6.DE HSBC MSCI China UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | -6.39% | 16.48% | 27.04% | -14.63% | -10.19% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RQFI.DE achieves a 0.32% return, which is significantly higher than H4Z6.DE's -6.39% return.
RQFI.DE
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -1.33%
- YTD
- 0.32%
- 6M
- 1.30%
- 1Y
- 17.71%
- 3Y*
- 3.07%
- 5Y*
- -1.59%
- 10Y*
- 4.00%
H4Z6.DE
- 1D
- -0.40%
- 1M
- -0.87%
- YTD
- -6.39%
- 6M
- -14.69%
- 1Y
- -0.94%
- 3Y*
- 4.89%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RQFI.DE vs. H4Z6.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
RQFI.DE has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than H4Z6.DE's 0.28% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
RQFI.DE vs. H4Z6.DE — Risk / Return Rank
RQFI.DE
H4Z6.DE
RQFI.DE vs. H4Z6.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 UCITS ETF 1D (RQFI.DE) and HSBC MSCI China UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (H4Z6.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RQFI.DE | H4Z6.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.09 | -0.04 | +1.13 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.52 | 0.09 | +1.43 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.01 | +0.20 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.72 | 0.13 | +3.58 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.67 | 0.33 | +8.34 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RQFI.DE | H4Z6.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.09 | -0.04 | +1.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.07 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.18 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.28 | 0.06 | +0.22 |
Correlation
The correlation between RQFI.DE and H4Z6.DE is 0.73, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
RQFI.DE vs. H4Z6.DE - Dividend Comparison
RQFI.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.58%, while H4Z6.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RQFI.DE Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 UCITS ETF 1D | 1.58% | 1.84% | 1.40% | 1.98% | 1.97% | 0.90% | 1.32% | 0.75% | 2.31% | 2.00% | 1.81% | 0.37% |
H4Z6.DE HSBC MSCI China UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
RQFI.DE vs. H4Z6.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RQFI.DE drawdown since its inception was -51.79%, which is greater than H4Z6.DE's maximum drawdown of -33.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RQFI.DE and H4Z6.DE.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RQFI.DE | H4Z6.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.79% | -33.47% | -18.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.78% | -15.70% | +7.92% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -41.44% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.24% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.86% | -14.69% | -5.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -27.23% | -13.93% | -13.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.49% | 6.31% | -3.82% |
Volatility
RQFI.DE vs. H4Z6.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 UCITS ETF 1D (RQFI.DE) is 4.72%, while HSBC MSCI China UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (H4Z6.DE) has a volatility of 6.10%. This indicates that RQFI.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than H4Z6.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RQFI.DE | H4Z6.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.72% | 6.10% | -1.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.12% | 13.41% | -2.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.23% | 21.47% | -5.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.97% | 25.46% | -4.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.88% | 25.46% | -3.58% |