RQFI.DE vs. AH50.DE
RQFI.DE (Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 UCITS ETF 1D) and AH50.DE (Xtrackers Harvest FTSE China A-H 50 UCITS ETF 1D) are both China Equities funds from Xtrackers - RQFI.DE tracks the MSCI China A Onshore NR CNY while AH50.DE tracks the MSCI China NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, RQFI.DE returned 5.34%/yr vs 8.17%/yr for AH50.DE. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.65% expense ratio.
Performance
RQFI.DE vs. AH50.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RQFI.DE achieves a 10.42% return, which is significantly lower than AH50.DE's 13.38% return. Over the past 10 years, RQFI.DE has underperformed AH50.DE with an annualized return of 5.34%, while AH50.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 8.17% annualized return.
RQFI.DE
- 1D
- -0.67%
- 1M
- 1.50%
- YTD
- 10.42%
- 6M
- 12.27%
- 1Y
- 34.46%
- 3Y*
- 9.38%
- 5Y*
- -0.26%
- 10Y*
- 5.34%
AH50.DE
- 1D
- -0.52%
- 1M
- 0.48%
- YTD
- 13.38%
- 6M
- 16.15%
- 1Y
- 31.49%
- 3Y*
- 12.81%
- 5Y*
- 1.06%
- 10Y*
- 8.17%
RQFI.DE vs. AH50.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RQFI.DE Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 UCITS ETF 1D | 10.42% | 11.14% | 22.25% | -16.68% | -21.96% | 7.77% | 24.32% | 37.46% | -24.88% | 16.25% |
AH50.DE Xtrackers Harvest FTSE China A-H 50 UCITS ETF 1D | 13.38% | 11.41% | 26.06% | -15.94% | -16.05% | 2.97% | 14.92% | 41.09% | -16.54% | 20.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between RQFI.DE and AH50.DE is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 31, 2016 | 0.88 |
The correlation between RQFI.DE and AH50.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RQFI.DE vs. AH50.DE — Risk / Return Rank
RQFI.DE
AH50.DE
RQFI.DE vs. AH50.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 UCITS ETF 1D (RQFI.DE) and Xtrackers Harvest FTSE China A-H 50 UCITS ETF 1D (AH50.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RQFI.DE | AH50.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.40 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.66 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.32 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.91 | 4.40 | +1.51 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.55 | 12.99 | +2.57 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RQFI.DE | AH50.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.23 | 1.83 | +0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.01 | 0.05 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.24 | 0.36 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.31 | 0.35 | -0.04 |
Drawdowns
RQFI.DE vs. AH50.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RQFI.DE drawdown since its inception was -51.79%, which is greater than AH50.DE's maximum drawdown of -45.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RQFI.DE and AH50.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RQFI.DE | AH50.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.79% | -45.20% | -6.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.82% | -7.15% | +1.33% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.48% | -25.16% | -2.32% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -41.44% | -38.11% | -3.33% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.24% | -45.20% | -0.04% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.80% | -5.93% | -5.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -27.06% | -16.78% | -10.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.21% | 2.43% | -0.22% |
Volatility
RQFI.DE vs. AH50.DE - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 UCITS ETF 1D (RQFI.DE) and Xtrackers Harvest FTSE China A-H 50 UCITS ETF 1D (AH50.DE) have volatilities of 5.89% and 5.94%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RQFI.DE | AH50.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.89% | 5.94% | -0.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.42% | 12.32% | -1.90% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.40% | 17.18% | -1.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.96% | 23.21% | -2.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.82% | 22.82% | -1.00% |
RQFI.DE vs. AH50.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both RQFI.DE and AH50.DE have an expense ratio of 0.65%.
Dividends
RQFI.DE vs. AH50.DE - Dividend Comparison
RQFI.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.44%, less than AH50.DE's 2.07% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AH50.DE Xtrackers Harvest FTSE China A-H 50 UCITS ETF 1D | 2.07% | 3.00% | 2.24% | 2.80% | 3.06% | 1.67% | 1.80% | 1.65% | 2.56% | 2.44% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RQFI.DE Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 UCITS ETF 1D | 1.44% | 1.84% | 1.40% | 1.98% | 1.97% | 0.90% | 1.32% | 0.75% | 2.31% | 2.00% | 1.81% | 0.37% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RQFI.DE and AH50.DE have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.65% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
RQFI.DE and AH50.DE have the same expense ratio: 0.65% per year.
RQFI.DE tracks MSCI China A Onshore NR CNY, while AH50.DE tracks MSCI China NR USD.
Find the right allocation for RQFI.DE and AH50.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer