RQFI.DE vs. 36BZ.DE
RQFI.DE (Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 UCITS ETF 1D) and 36BZ.DE (iShares MSCI China A UCITS ETF) are both China Equities funds - RQFI.DE tracks the MSCI China A Onshore NR CNY while 36BZ.DE tracks the MSCI China A Inclusion. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, RQFI.DE returned 5.34%/yr vs 5.98%/yr for 36BZ.DE. Their correlation of 0.95 suggests significant overlap in exposure. RQFI.DE charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for 36BZ.DE.
Performance
RQFI.DE vs. 36BZ.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RQFI.DE achieves a 10.42% return, which is significantly higher than 36BZ.DE's 9.71% return. Over the past 10 years, RQFI.DE has underperformed 36BZ.DE with an annualized return of 5.34%, while 36BZ.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 5.98% annualized return.
RQFI.DE
- 1D
- -0.67%
- 1M
- 1.50%
- YTD
- 10.42%
- 6M
- 12.27%
- 1Y
- 34.46%
- 3Y*
- 9.38%
- 5Y*
- -0.26%
- 10Y*
- 5.34%
36BZ.DE
- 1D
- -0.75%
- 1M
- 0.35%
- YTD
- 9.71%
- 6M
- 11.84%
- 1Y
- 33.04%
- 3Y*
- 8.44%
- 5Y*
- -0.23%
- 10Y*
- 5.98%
RQFI.DE vs. 36BZ.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RQFI.DE Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 UCITS ETF 1D | 10.42% | 11.14% | 22.25% | -16.68% | -21.96% | 7.77% | 24.32% | 37.46% | -24.88% | 16.25% |
36BZ.DE iShares MSCI China A UCITS ETF | 9.71% | 10.25% | 19.91% | -17.13% | -21.26% | 13.41% | 28.50% | 37.21% | -23.49% | 14.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between RQFI.DE and 36BZ.DE is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 15, 2015 | 0.95 |
The correlation between RQFI.DE and 36BZ.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RQFI.DE vs. 36BZ.DE — Risk / Return Rank
RQFI.DE
36BZ.DE
RQFI.DE vs. 36BZ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 UCITS ETF 1D (RQFI.DE) and iShares MSCI China A UCITS ETF (36BZ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RQFI.DE | 36BZ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.12 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.18 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.38 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.91 | 5.10 | +0.81 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.55 | 13.77 | +1.78 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RQFI.DE | 36BZ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.23 | 2.11 | +0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.01 | -0.01 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.24 | 0.27 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.31 | 0.03 | +0.28 |
Drawdowns
RQFI.DE vs. 36BZ.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RQFI.DE drawdown since its inception was -51.79%, roughly equal to the maximum 36BZ.DE drawdown of -53.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RQFI.DE and 36BZ.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RQFI.DE | 36BZ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.79% | -53.30% | +1.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.82% | -6.57% | +0.75% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.48% | -28.01% | +0.53% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -41.44% | -41.94% | +0.50% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.24% | -43.38% | -1.86% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.80% | -10.22% | -1.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -27.06% | -30.19% | +3.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.21% | 2.44% | -0.23% |
Volatility
RQFI.DE vs. 36BZ.DE - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 UCITS ETF 1D (RQFI.DE) has a higher volatility of 5.89% compared to iShares MSCI China A UCITS ETF (36BZ.DE) at 5.55%. This indicates that RQFI.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 36BZ.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RQFI.DE | 36BZ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.89% | 5.55% | +0.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.42% | 10.96% | -0.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.40% | 15.83% | -0.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.96% | 21.44% | -0.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.82% | 22.10% | -0.28% |
RQFI.DE vs. 36BZ.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
RQFI.DE has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than 36BZ.DE's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
RQFI.DE vs. 36BZ.DE - Dividend Comparison
RQFI.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.44%, while 36BZ.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
36BZ.DE iShares MSCI China A UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RQFI.DE Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 UCITS ETF 1D | 1.44% | 1.84% | 1.40% | 1.98% | 1.97% | 0.90% | 1.32% | 0.75% | 2.31% | 2.00% | 1.81% | 0.37% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, RQFI.DE and 36BZ.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, 36BZ.DE is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
36BZ.DE is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for RQFI.DE.
RQFI.DE tracks MSCI China A Onshore NR CNY, while 36BZ.DE tracks MSCI China A Inclusion. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for RQFI.DE and 0.40% for 36BZ.DE.
Find the right allocation for RQFI.DE and 36BZ.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer