RPV vs. FTA

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

RPV (Invesco S&P 500® Pure Value ETF) and FTA (First Trust Large Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds - RPV tracks the S&P 500 Pure Value Index while FTA tracks the NASDAQ AlphaDEX Large Cap Value Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, RPV returned 11.15%/yr vs 11.60%/yr for FTA. Their correlation of 0.92 means they have usually moved in the same direction. RPV charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for FTA.

Performance

RPV vs. FTA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500® Pure Value ETF (RPV) and First Trust Large Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund (FTA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RPV achieves a 16.52% return, which is significantly lower than FTA's 18.18% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with RPV having a 11.15% annualized return and FTA not far ahead at 11.60%.

RPV

• 1D: -0.36%
• 1M: 2.75%
• 6M: 12.21%
• YTD: 16.52%
• 1Y: 34.20%
• 3Y*: 16.76%
• 5Y*: 12.24%
• 10Y*: 11.15%
• ALL TIME*: 9.47%

FTA

• 1D: -0.29%
• 1M: 2.70%
• 6M: 12.86%
• YTD: 18.18%
• 1Y: 31.73%
• 3Y*: 15.29%
• 5Y*: 11.21%
• 10Y*: 11.60%
• ALL TIME*: 8.58%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FTA First Trust Large Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund	$3.06M	$3.30M	$2.95M
RPV Invesco S&P 500® Pure Value ETF	$14.78M	$14.37M	$15.41M

RPV vs. FTA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
RPV Invesco S&P 500® Pure Value ETF	16.52%	17.70%	12.41%	7.98%	-1.27%	34.22%	-8.69%	24.80%	-12.31%	17.30%
FTA First Trust Large Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund	18.18%	14.94%	10.13%	10.08%	-3.73%	29.32%	-0.38%	24.73%	-13.63%	18.47%

Correlation

The correlation between RPV and FTA is 0.90, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.90
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.93
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.95
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.95
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 11, 2007	0.92

The correlation between RPV and FTA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

RPV vs. FTA - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	RPV	FTA
Financial Services	18.8%	23.2%
Healthcare	18.3%	10.2%
Consumer Defensive	13.0%	6.5%
Consumer Cyclical	11.4%	9.3%
Energy	9.6%	9.2%
Basic Materials	7.5%	3.2%
Industrials	7.3%	8.8%
Communication Services	5.2%	4.6%
Utilities	4.1%	11.1%
Technology	3.4%	7.3%
Real Estate	1.6%	6.6%

Return for Risk

RPV vs. FTA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RPV

RPV Risk / Return Rank: 93
RPV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
RPV Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
RPV Omega Ratio Rank: 92
RPV Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
RPV Martin Ratio Rank: 92

FTA

FTA Risk / Return Rank: 94
FTA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
FTA Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
FTA Omega Ratio Rank: 92
FTA Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
FTA Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RPV vs. FTA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500® Pure Value ETF (RPV) and First Trust Large Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund (FTA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RPV	FTA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.63	2.63	0.00
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.77	3.90	-0.13
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.45	1.46	0.00
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.23	5.93	-1.70
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.58	20.26	-4.69

RPV vs. FTA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RPV Sharpe Ratio is 2.63, which is comparable to the FTA Sharpe Ratio of 2.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RPV and FTA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

RPV vs. FTA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RPV drawdown since its inception was -75.32%, which is greater than FTA's maximum drawdown of -62.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RPV and FTA.

Drawdown Indicators

	RPV	FTA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-75.32%	-62.45%	-12.87%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.74%	-5.13%	-2.61%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.90%	-18.73%	+3.83%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.64%	-19.80%	-2.84%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-50.67%	-44.97%	-5.70%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.82%	-1.56%	-0.26%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.61%	-8.97%	-1.64%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.10%	1.50%	+0.60%

Volatility

RPV vs. FTA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500® Pure Value ETF (RPV) is 3.12%, while First Trust Large Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund (FTA) has a volatility of 3.93%. This indicates that RPV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FTA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RPV	FTA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.12%	3.93%	-0.81%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.20%	8.04%	+0.16%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.50%	11.61%	+0.89%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.60%	16.23%	+1.37%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.80%	19.85%	+1.95%

RPV vs. FTA - Expense Ratio Comparison

RPV has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than FTA's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

RPV vs. FTA - Dividend Comparison

RPV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.28%, more than FTA's 1.61% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FTA First Trust Large Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund	1.61%	1.89%	2.02%	2.10%	2.15%	1.54%	2.03%	1.88%	2.28%	1.53%	1.56%	2.05%
RPV Invesco S&P 500® Pure Value ETF	2.28%	2.50%	2.16%	2.38%	2.29%	1.92%	2.11%	2.28%	2.49%	1.73%	1.73%	2.39%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RPV and FTA in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.90, RPV and FTA move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, RPV or FTA?

FTA has higher volatility (3.93%) compared to RPV (3.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RPV dropped -75.32% vs FTA's -62.45%.

Which ETF is better, RPV or FTA?

On 10-year performance, FTA leads with 11.60% vs 11.15% for RPV. On fees, RPV is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, RPV has been the lower-risk option at 3.12%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, RPV or FTA?

Over the 10-year period, FTA has performed better with a 11.60% return vs 11.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, RPV or FTA?

RPV is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for FTA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RPV or FTA?

RPV has the higher dividend yield at 2.28%, compared with 1.61% for FTA.

What is the main difference between RPV and FTA?

RPV tracks S&P 500 Pure Value Index, while FTA tracks NASDAQ AlphaDEX Large Cap Value Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for RPV and 0.60% for FTA.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FTA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.63 vs 2.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.