RPV vs. CBSE
RPV (Invesco S&P 500® Pure Value ETF) and CBSE (Clough Select Equity ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. RPV is passively managed, while CBSE is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, RPV returned 9.29%/yr vs 12.52%/yr for CBSE. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RPV charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for CBSE.
Performance
RPV vs. CBSE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RPV achieves a 10.48% return, which is significantly lower than CBSE's 32.18% return.
RPV
- 1D
- -0.60%
- 1M
- 2.84%
- YTD
- 10.48%
- 6M
- 12.73%
- 1Y
- 27.41%
- 3Y*
- 18.14%
- 5Y*
- 9.29%
- 10Y*
- 10.64%
CBSE
- 1D
- -0.93%
- 1M
- 10.89%
- YTD
- 32.18%
- 6M
- 29.85%
- 1Y
- 51.66%
- 3Y*
- 31.65%
- 5Y*
- 12.52%
- 10Y*
- —
RPV vs. CBSE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RPV Invesco S&P 500® Pure Value ETF | 10.48% | 17.70% | 12.41% | 7.98% | -1.27% | 34.22% | 7.86% |
CBSE Clough Select Equity ETF | 32.18% | 19.53% | 32.20% | 17.29% | -19.92% | 14.57% | 16.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between RPV and CBSE is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 16, 2020 | 0.63 |
Over the past year, the correlation between RPV and CBSE has dropped to 0.39 - well below their long-term average of 0.63, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RPV vs. CBSE — Risk / Return Rank
RPV
CBSE
RPV vs. CBSE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500® Pure Value ETF (RPV) and Clough Select Equity ETF (CBSE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RPV | CBSE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.12 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.15 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.37 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.56 | 3.83 | -0.27 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.45 | 11.59 | +0.86 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RPV | CBSE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.19 | 2.30 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.52 | 0.52 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.49 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.38 | 0.80 | -0.43 |
Drawdowns
RPV vs. CBSE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RPV drawdown since its inception was -75.32%, which is greater than CBSE's maximum drawdown of -36.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RPV and CBSE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RPV | CBSE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -75.32% | -36.30% | -39.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.74% | -13.57% | +5.83% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.50% | -29.40% | +13.90% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.64% | -36.30% | +13.66% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -50.67% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.60% | -0.93% | +0.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.69% | -12.31% | +1.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.21% | 4.47% | -2.26% |
Volatility
RPV vs. CBSE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500® Pure Value ETF (RPV) is 2.54%, while Clough Select Equity ETF (CBSE) has a volatility of 7.80%. This indicates that RPV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CBSE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RPV | CBSE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.54% | 7.80% | -5.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.50% | 17.58% | -9.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.63% | 22.55% | -9.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.88% | 24.06% | -6.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.92% | 23.79% | -1.87% |
RPV vs. CBSE - Expense Ratio Comparison
RPV has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than CBSE's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
RPV vs. CBSE - Dividend Comparison
RPV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.28%, more than CBSE's 0.26% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CBSE Clough Select Equity ETF | 0.26% | 0.35% | 0.37% | 1.50% | 0.52% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RPV Invesco S&P 500® Pure Value ETF | 2.28% | 2.50% | 2.16% | 2.38% | 2.29% | 1.92% | 2.11% | 2.28% | 2.49% | 1.73% | 1.73% | 2.39% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RPV and CBSE have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CBSE has higher volatility (7.80%) compared to RPV (2.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RPV dropped -75.32% vs CBSE's -36.30%.
On 5-year performance, CBSE leads with 12.52% vs 9.29% for RPV. On fees, RPV is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, RPV has been the lower-risk option at 2.54%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, CBSE has performed better with a 12.52% return vs 9.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
RPV is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for CBSE.
RPV has the higher dividend yield at 2.28%, compared with 0.26% for CBSE.
They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Clough. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for RPV and 0.85% for CBSE.
CBSE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.30 vs 2.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RPV and CBSE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer