RPMGX vs. FDGRX

In the year-to-date period, RPMGX achieves a 2.61% return, which is significantly higher than FDGRX's 1.31% return. Over the past 10 years, RPMGX has underperformed FDGRX with an annualized return of 3.30%, while FDGRX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.53% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

RPMGX has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is lower than FDGRX's 0.79% expense ratio.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth Fund (RPMGX) and Fidelity Growth Company Fund (FDGRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current RPMGX Sharpe Ratio is 0.26, which is lower than the FDGRX Sharpe Ratio of 1.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RPMGX and FDGRX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Neither RPMGX nor FDGRX has paid dividends to shareholders.

The maximum RPMGX drawdown since its inception was -58.69%, smaller than the maximum FDGRX drawdown of -71.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RPMGX and FDGRX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

The current volatility for T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth Fund (RPMGX) is 4.96%, while Fidelity Growth Company Fund (FDGRX) has a volatility of 10.41%. This indicates that RPMGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FDGRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.