RPHS vs. RULE

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Regents Park Hedged Market Strategy ETF (RPHS) and Adaptive Core ETF (RULE).

RPHS and RULE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. RPHS is an actively managed fund by Regents Park. It was launched on Mar 30, 2022. RULE is an actively managed fund by Mohr Funds. It was launched on Nov 2, 2021.

Performance

RPHS vs. RULE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Regents Park Hedged Market Strategy ETF (RPHS) and Adaptive Core ETF (RULE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

RPHS vs. RULE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
RPHS Regents Park Hedged Market Strategy ETF	-4.22%	11.74%	17.84%	11.36%	-14.01%
RULE Adaptive Core ETF	5.57%	4.60%	7.59%	6.29%	-14.32%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RPHS achieves a -4.22% return, which is significantly lower than RULE's 5.57% return.

RPHS

• 1D: 0.58%
• 1M: -3.70%
• YTD: -4.22%
• 6M: -2.41%
• 1Y: 10.70%
• 3Y*: 11.94%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

RULE

• 1D: 2.49%
• 1M: -6.00%
• YTD: 5.57%
• 6M: 5.32%
• 1Y: 16.97%
• 3Y*: 8.29%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RPHS vs. RULE - Expense Ratio Comparison

RPHS has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than RULE's 1.10% expense ratio.

RULE

Adaptive Core ETF

RPHS

Regents Park Hedged Market Strategy ETF

Return for Risk

RPHS vs. RULE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RPHS

RPHS Risk / Return Rank: 46
RPHS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
RPHS Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
RPHS Omega Ratio Rank: 40
RPHS Calmar Ratio Rank: 46
RPHS Martin Ratio Rank: 49

RULE

RULE Risk / Return Rank: 45
RULE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
RULE Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
RULE Omega Ratio Rank: 41
RULE Calmar Ratio Rank: 47
RULE Martin Ratio Rank: 49

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RPHS vs. RULE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Regents Park Hedged Market Strategy ETF (RPHS) and Adaptive Core ETF (RULE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RPHS	RULE	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.95	0.88	+0.07
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.37	1.29	+0.08
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	1.17	0.00
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.42	1.37	+0.05
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	5.53	5.36	+0.17
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RPHS vs. RULE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RPHS Sharpe Ratio is 0.95, which is comparable to the RULE Sharpe Ratio of 0.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RPHS and RULE, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RPHS	RULE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.95	0.88	+0.07
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.42	-0.03	+0.45

Correlation

The correlation between RPHS and RULE is 0.64, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

RPHS vs. RULE - Dividend Comparison

RPHS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.62%, while RULE has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
RPHS Regents Park Hedged Market Strategy ETF	11.62%	11.13%	3.68%	5.23%	1.29%
RULE Adaptive Core ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	2.01%	0.01%

Drawdowns

RPHS vs. RULE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RPHS drawdown since its inception was -15.77%, smaller than the maximum RULE drawdown of -30.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RPHS and RULE.

Drawdown Indicators

	RPHS	RULE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.77%	-30.48%	+14.71%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.81%	-12.65%	+4.84%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.39%	-7.15%	+1.76%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.18%	-15.50%	+9.32%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.00%	3.24%	-1.24%

Volatility

RPHS vs. RULE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Regents Park Hedged Market Strategy ETF (RPHS) is 3.42%, while Adaptive Core ETF (RULE) has a volatility of 8.24%. This indicates that RPHS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RULE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RPHS	RULE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.42%	8.24%	-4.82%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.80%	15.26%	-7.46%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.29%	19.40%	-8.11%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.44%	13.94%	-2.50%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.44%	13.94%	-2.50%