PortfoliosLab logo
RULE vs. GAA
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between RULE and GAA is 0.53, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

RULE vs. GAA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Adaptive Core ETF (RULE) and Cambria Global Asset Allocation ETF (GAA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

RULE:

0.02

GAA:

0.72

Sortino Ratio

RULE:

0.06

GAA:

0.97

Omega Ratio

RULE:

1.01

GAA:

1.13

Calmar Ratio

RULE:

-0.03

GAA:

0.96

Martin Ratio

RULE:

-0.10

GAA:

3.18

Ulcer Index

RULE:

6.80%

GAA:

2.17%

Daily Std Dev

RULE:

17.00%

GAA:

10.26%

Max Drawdown

RULE:

-30.48%

GAA:

-26.57%

Current Drawdown

RULE:

-13.28%

GAA:

-0.15%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RULE achieves a -0.80% return, which is significantly lower than GAA's 5.13% return.


RULE

YTD

-0.80%

1M

5.08%

6M

-7.39%

1Y

0.37%

3Y*

1.79%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

GAA

YTD

5.13%

1M

2.97%

6M

2.70%

1Y

7.39%

3Y*

4.70%

5Y*

7.70%

10Y*

5.32%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Adaptive Core ETF

RULE vs. GAA - Expense Ratio Comparison

RULE has a 1.10% expense ratio, which is higher than GAA's 0.41% expense ratio.


Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

RULE vs. GAA — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RULE
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of RULE is 1414
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of RULE is 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of RULE is 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of RULE is 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of RULE is 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of RULE is 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

GAA
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of GAA is 6464
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of GAA is 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of GAA is 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of GAA is 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of GAA is 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of GAA is 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

RULE vs. GAA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Adaptive Core ETF (RULE) and Cambria Global Asset Allocation ETF (GAA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current RULE Sharpe Ratio is 0.02, which is lower than the GAA Sharpe Ratio of 0.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RULE and GAA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

RULE vs. GAA - Dividend Comparison

RULE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GAA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.07%.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
RULE
Adaptive Core ETF
0.00%0.00%2.01%0.01%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GAA
Cambria Global Asset Allocation ETF
4.07%3.88%3.73%6.05%4.21%2.73%3.32%3.00%2.35%2.81%2.49%0.57%

Drawdowns

RULE vs. GAA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RULE drawdown since its inception was -30.48%, which is greater than GAA's maximum drawdown of -26.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RULE and GAA.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

RULE vs. GAA - Volatility Comparison

Adaptive Core ETF (RULE) has a higher volatility of 3.43% compared to Cambria Global Asset Allocation ETF (GAA) at 1.89%. This indicates that RULE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GAA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...