RPHIX vs. FIHBX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

RPHIX (RiverPark Short Term High Yield Fund) and FIHBX (Federated Hermes Institutional High Yield Bond Fund) are both High Yield Bonds funds. Over the past 10 years, RPHIX returned 3.52%/yr vs 5.07%/yr for FIHBX. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. RPHIX charges 0.89%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for FIHBX.

Performance

RPHIX vs. FIHBX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in RiverPark Short Term High Yield Fund (RPHIX) and Federated Hermes Institutional High Yield Bond Fund (FIHBX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RPHIX achieves a 1.87% return, which is significantly higher than FIHBX's 1.04% return. Over the past 10 years, RPHIX has underperformed FIHBX with an annualized return of 3.52%, while FIHBX has yielded a comparatively higher 5.07% annualized return.

RPHIX

• 1D: 0.10%
• 1M: 0.32%
• YTD: 1.87%
• 6M: 2.00%
• 1Y: 4.39%
• 3Y*: 5.61%
• 5Y*: 4.61%
• 10Y*: 3.52%

FIHBX

• 1D: -0.11%
• 1M: 0.72%
• YTD: 1.04%
• 6M: 2.01%
• 1Y: 5.79%
• 3Y*: 8.32%
• 5Y*: 3.36%
• 10Y*: 5.07%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RPHIX vs. FIHBX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
RPHIX RiverPark Short Term High Yield Fund	1.87%	4.76%	6.71%	5.87%	2.97%	2.05%	1.95%	2.77%	2.44%	2.50%
FIHBX Federated Hermes Institutional High Yield Bond Fund	1.04%	8.59%	6.40%	13.17%	-12.64%	3.92%	5.99%	15.01%	-2.80%	7.19%

Correlation

The correlation between RPHIX and FIHBX is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.03
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.10
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.23
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.23
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2011	0.26

Over the past year, the correlation between RPHIX and FIHBX has dropped to 0.03 - well below their long-term average of 0.26, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

RPHIX vs. FIHBX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RPHIX

RPHIX Risk / Return Rank: 100
RPHIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
RPHIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
RPHIX Omega Ratio Rank: 99
RPHIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
RPHIX Martin Ratio Rank: 100

FIHBX

FIHBX Risk / Return Rank: 61
FIHBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
FIHBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
FIHBX Omega Ratio Rank: 76
FIHBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 46
FIHBX Martin Ratio Rank: 72

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RPHIX vs. FIHBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RiverPark Short Term High Yield Fund (RPHIX) and Federated Hermes Institutional High Yield Bond Fund (FIHBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RPHIX	FIHBX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	5.17	1.77	+3.40
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	10.99	3.09	+7.90
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	3.74	1.45	+2.29
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	43.68	2.47	+41.21
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	111.08	12.90	+98.18

RPHIX vs. FIHBX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RPHIX Sharpe Ratio is 5.17, which is higher than the FIHBX Sharpe Ratio of 1.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RPHIX and FIHBX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

RPHIX vs. FIHBX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RPHIX drawdown since its inception was -3.16%, smaller than the maximum FIHBX drawdown of -31.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RPHIX and FIHBX.

Drawdown Indicators

	RPHIX	FIHBX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-3.16%	-31.05%	+27.89%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.10%	-2.45%	+2.35%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-0.72%	-3.60%	+2.88%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-0.92%	-16.35%	+15.43%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-3.16%	-21.67%	+18.51%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.34%	+0.34%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.09%	-2.29%	+2.20%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.04%	0.47%	-0.43%

Volatility

RPHIX vs. FIHBX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for RiverPark Short Term High Yield Fund (RPHIX) is 0.22%, while Federated Hermes Institutional High Yield Bond Fund (FIHBX) has a volatility of 0.89%. This indicates that RPHIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FIHBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RPHIX	FIHBX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.22%	0.89%	-0.67%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	0.60%	2.75%	-2.15%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.88%	3.43%	-2.55%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	1.26%	5.20%	-3.94%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	1.20%	5.75%	-4.55%

RPHIX vs. FIHBX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RPHIX has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than FIHBX's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

RPHIX vs. FIHBX - Dividend Comparison

RPHIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.07%, less than FIHBX's 6.45% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FIHBX Federated Hermes Institutional High Yield Bond Fund	6.45%	6.29%	5.94%	5.93%	4.58%	4.25%	5.14%	5.79%	6.24%	5.55%	5.75%	6.46%
RPHIX RiverPark Short Term High Yield Fund	4.07%	4.76%	6.40%	5.08%	3.46%	2.03%	2.44%	2.85%	2.83%	2.68%	2.63%	3.19%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RPHIX and FIHBX in my portfolio?

RPHIX and FIHBX have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RPHIX or FIHBX?

FIHBX has higher volatility (0.89%) compared to RPHIX (0.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RPHIX dropped -3.16% vs FIHBX's -31.05%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RPHIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.17 vs 1.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.