RPHIX vs. DHF
RPHIX (RiverPark Short Term High Yield Fund) and DHF (Dimensional High Yield Fund) are both High Yield Bonds funds. Over the past 10 years, RPHIX returned 3.52%/yr vs 5.54%/yr for DHF. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. RPHIX charges 0.89%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for DHF.
Performance
RPHIX vs. DHF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RPHIX achieves a 1.87% return, which is significantly higher than DHF's 0.33% return. Over the past 10 years, RPHIX has underperformed DHF with an annualized return of 3.52%, while DHF has yielded a comparatively higher 5.54% annualized return.
RPHIX
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- 0.32%
- YTD
- 1.87%
- 6M
- 2.00%
- 1Y
- 4.39%
- 3Y*
- 5.61%
- 5Y*
- 4.61%
- 10Y*
- 3.52%
DHF
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.52%
- YTD
- 0.33%
- 6M
- 0.74%
- 1Y
- 3.16%
- 3Y*
- 12.25%
- 5Y*
- 2.29%
- 10Y*
- 5.54%
RPHIX vs. DHF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RPHIX RiverPark Short Term High Yield Fund | 1.87% | 4.76% | 6.71% | 5.87% | 2.97% | 2.05% | 1.95% | 2.77% | 2.44% | 2.50% |
DHF Dimensional High Yield Fund | 0.33% | 5.67% | 21.12% | 15.00% | -22.70% | 10.35% | 6.46% | 24.68% | -11.11% | 8.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between RPHIX and DHF is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2011 | 0.14 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RPHIX vs. DHF — Risk / Return Rank
RPHIX
DHF
RPHIX vs. DHF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RiverPark Short Term High Yield Fund (RPHIX) and Dimensional High Yield Fund (DHF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RPHIX | DHF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +4.90 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +10.49 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 3.74 | 1.06 | +2.69 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 43.68 | 0.37 | +43.31 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 111.08 | 1.01 | +110.07 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RPHIX vs. DHF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RPHIX drawdown since its inception was -3.16%, smaller than the maximum DHF drawdown of -71.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RPHIX and DHF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RPHIX | DHF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.16% | -71.32% | +68.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.10% | -8.66% | +8.56% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -0.72% | -11.81% | +11.09% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -0.92% | -37.82% | +36.90% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -3.16% | -42.94% | +39.78% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -3.85% | +3.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.09% | -22.99% | +22.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.04% | 3.14% | -3.10% |
Volatility
RPHIX vs. DHF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for RiverPark Short Term High Yield Fund (RPHIX) is 0.22%, while Dimensional High Yield Fund (DHF) has a volatility of 2.29%. This indicates that RPHIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DHF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RPHIX | DHF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.22% | 2.29% | -2.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.60% | 9.43% | -8.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.88% | 11.90% | -11.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.26% | 15.76% | -14.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.20% | 17.73% | -16.53% |
RPHIX vs. DHF - Expense Ratio Comparison
RPHIX has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than DHF's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
RPHIX vs. DHF - Dividend Comparison
RPHIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.07%, less than DHF's 8.75% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DHF Dimensional High Yield Fund | 8.75% | 8.47% | 8.14% | 7.86% | 10.12% | 8.24% | 8.60% | 8.52% | 10.41% | 8.98% | 9.76% | 11.30% |
RPHIX RiverPark Short Term High Yield Fund | 4.07% | 4.76% | 6.40% | 5.08% | 3.46% | 2.03% | 2.44% | 2.85% | 2.83% | 2.68% | 2.63% | 3.19% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RPHIX and DHF have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DHF has higher volatility (2.29%) compared to RPHIX (0.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RPHIX dropped -3.16% vs DHF's -71.32%.
RPHIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.17 vs 0.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RPHIX and DHF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer