DHF vs. DMA

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

DHF (Dimensional High Yield Fund) and DMA (Dimensional Managed Account Fund) are both mutual funds - DHF is a High Yield Bonds fund managed by Dimensional Fund Advisors, while DMA is a Diversified Portfolio fund managed by Dimensional Fund Advisors. Over the past 3 years, DHF returned 11.78%/yr vs 23.84%/yr for DMA. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DHF charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for DMA.

Performance

DHF vs. DMA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dimensional High Yield Fund (DHF) and Dimensional Managed Account Fund (DMA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DHF achieves a 0.22% return, which is significantly higher than DMA's -6.27% return.

DHF

• 1D: -1.24%
• 1M: -0.93%
• 6M: -1.76%
• YTD: 0.22%
• 1Y: 0.37%
• 3Y*: 11.78%
• 5Y*: 0.70%
• 10Y*: 5.26%

DMA

• 1D: -1.02%
• 1M: 5.17%
• 6M: -6.90%
• YTD: -6.27%
• 1Y: 3.79%
• 3Y*: 23.84%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DHF vs. DMA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
DHF Dimensional High Yield Fund	0.22%	5.67%	21.12%	15.00%	-24.06%
DMA Dimensional Managed Account Fund	-6.27%	16.89%	41.06%	-3.81%	-37.55%

Correlation

The correlation between DHF and DMA is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.20
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.17
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 13, 2022	0.19

Return for Risk

DHF vs. DMA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DHF

DHF Risk / Return Rank: 4
DHF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
DHF Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
DHF Omega Ratio Rank: 3
DHF Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
DHF Martin Ratio Rank: 4

DMA

DMA Risk / Return Rank: 5
DMA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6
DMA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
DMA Omega Ratio Rank: 6
DMA Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
DMA Martin Ratio Rank: 5

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DHF vs. DMA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional High Yield Fund (DHF) and Dimensional Managed Account Fund (DMA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DHF	DMA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.03	0.24	-0.21
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.14	0.45	-0.32
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.02	1.06	-0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.04	0.21	-0.16
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.12	0.54	-0.43

DHF vs. DMA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DHF Sharpe Ratio is 0.03, which is lower than the DMA Sharpe Ratio of 0.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DHF and DMA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

DHF vs. DMA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DHF drawdown since its inception was -71.32%, which is greater than DMA's maximum drawdown of -53.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DHF and DMA.

Drawdown Indicators

	DHF	DMA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-71.32%	-53.24%	-18.08%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.66%	-18.34%	+9.68%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-11.81%	-18.34%	+6.53%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-35.92%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-42.94%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.95%	-7.95%	+4.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-22.95%	-25.49%	+2.54%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.23%	6.97%	-3.74%

Volatility

DHF vs. DMA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Dimensional High Yield Fund (DHF) is 2.16%, while Dimensional Managed Account Fund (DMA) has a volatility of 5.56%. This indicates that DHF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DMA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DHF	DMA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.16%	5.56%	-3.40%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.24%	13.94%	-4.70%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.71%	15.59%	-3.88%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.05%	27.14%	-12.09%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.71%	27.14%	-9.43%

DHF vs. DMA - Expense Ratio Comparison

DHF has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is higher than DMA's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

DHF vs. DMA - Dividend Comparison

DHF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.82%, less than DMA's 15.78% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DHF Dimensional High Yield Fund	8.82%	8.47%	8.14%	7.86%	10.12%	8.24%	8.60%	8.52%	10.41%	8.98%	9.76%	11.30%
DMA Dimensional Managed Account Fund	15.78%	9.42%	3.83%	5.22%	10.14%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DHF and DMA in my portfolio?

DHF and DMA have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DHF or DMA?

DMA has higher volatility (5.56%) compared to DHF (2.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DHF dropped -71.32% vs DMA's -53.24%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DMA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.24 vs 0.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.