PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DHF vs. DMB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DHF vs. DMB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dimensional High Yield Fund (DHF) and Dimensional Multi-Blend Fund (DMB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DHF achieves a 0.33% return, which is significantly lower than DMB's 2.19% return. Over the past 10 years, DHF has outperformed DMB with an annualized return of 5.54%, while DMB has yielded a comparatively lower 1.98% annualized return.


DHF

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.52%
YTD
0.33%
6M
0.23%
1Y
2.75%
3Y*
12.25%
5Y*
2.35%
10Y*
5.54%

DMB

1D
-0.18%
1M
2.04%
YTD
2.19%
6M
4.09%
1Y
14.30%
3Y*
5.16%
5Y*
-1.40%
10Y*
1.98%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DHF vs. DMB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DHF
Dimensional High Yield Fund
0.33%5.67%21.12%15.00%-22.70%10.35%6.46%24.68%-11.11%8.43%
DMB
Dimensional Multi-Blend Fund
2.19%10.69%3.87%2.42%-23.23%7.04%0.75%28.84%-3.89%11.52%

Correlation

The correlation between DHF and DMB is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.25

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.22

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 26, 2013

0.20

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DHF vs. DMB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DHF
DHF Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
DHF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DHF Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
DHF Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
DHF Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
DHF Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

DMB
DMB Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
DMB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DMB Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
DMB Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
DMB Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
DMB Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DHF vs. DMB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional High Yield Fund (DHF) and Dimensional Multi-Blend Fund (DMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DHFDMBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.96

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.05

1.31

-0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.32

1.80

-1.48

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.88

6.46

-5.58

DHF vs. DMB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DHF Sharpe Ratio is 0.23, which is lower than the DMB Sharpe Ratio of 1.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DHF and DMB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DHF vs. DMB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DHF drawdown since its inception was -71.32%, which is greater than DMB's maximum drawdown of -40.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DHF and DMB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DHFDMBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-71.32%

-40.15%

-31.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.66%

-8.00%

-0.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.81%

-22.06%

+10.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.82%

-40.15%

+2.33%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.94%

-40.15%

-2.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.85%

-18.86%

+15.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.99%

-14.30%

-8.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.13%

2.22%

+0.91%

Volatility

DHF vs. DMB - Volatility Comparison

Dimensional High Yield Fund (DHF) has a higher volatility of 2.44% compared to Dimensional Multi-Blend Fund (DMB) at 1.78%. This indicates that DHF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DMB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DHFDMBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.44%

1.78%

+0.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.46%

6.93%

+2.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.92%

9.02%

+2.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.76%

14.67%

+1.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.74%

15.20%

+2.54%

DHF vs. DMB - Expense Ratio Comparison

DHF has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is higher than DMB's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

DHF vs. DMB - Dividend Comparison

DHF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.75%, more than DMB's 4.60% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DHF
Dimensional High Yield Fund
8.75%8.47%8.14%7.86%10.12%8.24%8.60%8.52%10.41%8.98%9.76%11.30%
DMB
Dimensional Multi-Blend Fund
4.60%3.93%3.48%4.46%5.80%4.42%4.54%4.36%5.36%4.89%5.97%6.06%

Frequently Asked Questions


DHF and DMB have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DHF has higher volatility (2.44%) compared to DMB (1.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DHF dropped -71.32% vs DMB's -40.15%.

DMB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.59 vs 0.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DHF and DMB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer