RPG vs. SOXQ
RPG (Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF) and SOXQ (Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RPG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the S&P 500/Citigroup Pure Growth Index, while SOXQ is a Semiconductors fund tracking the PHLX Semiconductor Sector Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, RPG returned 28.39%/yr vs 59.40%/yr for SOXQ. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RPG charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for SOXQ.
Performance
RPG vs. SOXQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RPG achieves a 31.51% return, which is significantly lower than SOXQ's 96.72% return.
RPG
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- 11.54%
- YTD
- 31.51%
- 6M
- 32.14%
- 1Y
- 41.04%
- 3Y*
- 28.39%
- 5Y*
- 13.02%
- 10Y*
- 14.81%
SOXQ
- 1D
- 1.42%
- 1M
- 32.12%
- YTD
- 96.72%
- 6M
- 91.61%
- 1Y
- 181.76%
- 3Y*
- 59.40%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RPG vs. SOXQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RPG Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF | 31.51% | 13.41% | 28.23% | 8.04% | -27.55% | 21.25% |
SOXQ Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF | 96.72% | 43.11% | 20.16% | 66.74% | -35.59% | 24.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between RPG and SOXQ is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 14, 2021 | 0.79 |
The correlation between RPG and SOXQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.
RPG vs. SOXQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
RPG
SOXQ
Technology
Industrials
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Communication Services
-
Healthcare
-
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Technology
RPG
SOXQ
Industrials
RPG
SOXQ
-
Consumer Cyclical
RPG
SOXQ
-
Communication Services
RPG
SOXQ
-
Healthcare
RPG
SOXQ
-
Financial Services
RPG
SOXQ
Basic Materials
RPG
SOXQ
-
Energy
RPG
SOXQ
-
Utilities
RPG
SOXQ
-
Real Estate
RPG
SOXQ
-
Consumer Defensive
RPG
SOXQ
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RPG vs. SOXQ — Risk / Return Rank
RPG
SOXQ
RPG vs. SOXQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF (RPG) and Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF (SOXQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RPG | SOXQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.34 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.40 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.72 | -0.36 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.72 | 11.73 | -8.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.56 | 45.01 | -30.46 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RPG | SOXQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.09 | 5.43 | -3.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.56 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.65 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.54 | 0.98 | -0.44 |
Drawdowns
RPG vs. SOXQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RPG drawdown since its inception was -53.27%, which is greater than SOXQ's maximum drawdown of -46.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RPG and SOXQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RPG | SOXQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.27% | -46.01% | -7.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.08% | -15.59% | +4.51% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.75% | -39.36% | +14.61% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.59% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.58% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.84% | -12.96% | +4.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.83% | 4.06% | -1.23% |
Volatility
RPG vs. SOXQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF (RPG) is 6.43%, while Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF (SOXQ) has a volatility of 13.44%. This indicates that RPG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SOXQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RPG | SOXQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.43% | 13.44% | -7.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.26% | 26.70% | -10.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.73% | 33.78% | -14.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.44% | 36.38% | -12.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.70% | 36.38% | -13.68% |
RPG vs. SOXQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
RPG has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than SOXQ's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
RPG vs. SOXQ - Dividend Comparison
RPG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.17%, less than SOXQ's 0.26% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RPG Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF | 0.17% | 0.24% | 0.25% | 1.44% | 0.74% | 0.00% | 0.46% | 0.83% | 0.47% | 0.56% | 0.43% | 0.73% |
SOXQ Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF | 0.26% | 0.50% | 0.68% | 0.87% | 1.36% | 0.72% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RPG and SOXQ have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SOXQ has higher volatility (13.44%) compared to RPG (6.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RPG dropped -53.27% vs SOXQ's -46.01%.
On 3-year performance, SOXQ leads with 59.40% vs 28.39% for RPG. On fees, SOXQ is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, RPG has been the lower-risk option at 6.43%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, SOXQ has performed better with a 59.40% return vs 28.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SOXQ is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for RPG.
SOXQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.26%, compared with 0.17% for RPG.
RPG is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while SOXQ is Semiconductors. RPG tracks S&P 500/Citigroup Pure Growth Index, while SOXQ tracks PHLX Semiconductor Sector Index. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for RPG and 0.19% for SOXQ.
SOXQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.43 vs 2.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RPG and SOXQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer