RPFRX vs. IRFIX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

RPFRX (Davis Real Estate Fund) and IRFIX (Cohen & Steers International Realty Fund) are both REIT funds. Over the past 10 years, RPFRX returned 3.81%/yr vs 2.61%/yr for IRFIX. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RPFRX charges 0.95%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for IRFIX.

Performance

RPFRX vs. IRFIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Davis Real Estate Fund (RPFRX) and Cohen & Steers International Realty Fund (IRFIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RPFRX achieves a 7.63% return, which is significantly higher than IRFIX's -0.55% return. Over the past 10 years, RPFRX has outperformed IRFIX with an annualized return of 3.81%, while IRFIX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.61% annualized return.

RPFRX

• 1D: 0.99%
• 1M: 2.06%
• YTD: 7.63%
• 6M: 6.84%
• 1Y: 4.37%
• 3Y*: 4.68%
• 5Y*: -0.55%
• 10Y*: 3.81%

IRFIX

• 1D: -0.22%
• 1M: -3.71%
• YTD: -0.55%
• 6M: 0.95%
• 1Y: 7.06%
• 3Y*: 5.34%
• 5Y*: -3.15%
• 10Y*: 2.61%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RPFRX vs. IRFIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
RPFRX Davis Real Estate Fund	7.63%	-6.17%	2.30%	10.48%	-26.78%	43.26%	-8.25%	25.39%	-4.52%	8.32%
IRFIX Cohen & Steers International Realty Fund	-0.55%	23.52%	-10.56%	4.58%	-23.84%	7.66%	-0.81%	23.74%	-3.74%	23.38%

Correlation

The correlation between RPFRX and IRFIX is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.50
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.52
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.56
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.50
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 1, 2005	0.55

The correlation between RPFRX and IRFIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

RPFRX vs. IRFIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RPFRX

RPFRX Risk / Return Rank: 5
RPFRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
RPFRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
RPFRX Omega Ratio Rank: 4
RPFRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
RPFRX Martin Ratio Rank: 5

IRFIX

IRFIX Risk / Return Rank: 6
IRFIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6
IRFIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
IRFIX Omega Ratio Rank: 6
IRFIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
IRFIX Martin Ratio Rank: 5

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RPFRX vs. IRFIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Davis Real Estate Fund (RPFRX) and Cohen & Steers International Realty Fund (IRFIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RPFRX	IRFIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.30	0.50	-0.21
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.51	0.83	-0.32
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.06	1.10	-0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.42	0.44	-0.02
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.02	1.38	-0.36
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RPFRX vs. IRFIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RPFRX Sharpe Ratio is 0.30, which is lower than the IRFIX Sharpe Ratio of 0.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RPFRX and IRFIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RPFRX	IRFIX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.30	0.50	-0.21
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.03	-0.21	+0.18
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.18	0.17	+0.01
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.37	0.19	+0.18

Drawdowns

RPFRX vs. IRFIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RPFRX drawdown since its inception was -75.01%, which is greater than IRFIX's maximum drawdown of -70.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RPFRX and IRFIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	RPFRX	IRFIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-75.01%	-70.13%	-4.88%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.13%	-14.85%	+4.72%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.20%	-21.06%	-1.14%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-35.52%	-38.41%	+2.89%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-42.29%	-39.51%	-2.78%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-16.53%	-17.16%	+0.63%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.41%	-18.66%	+5.25%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.18%	4.71%	-0.53%

Volatility

RPFRX vs. IRFIX - Volatility Comparison

Davis Real Estate Fund (RPFRX) has a higher volatility of 4.43% compared to Cohen & Steers International Realty Fund (IRFIX) at 3.87%. This indicates that RPFRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IRFIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RPFRX	IRFIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.43%	3.87%	+0.56%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.10%	10.74%	-0.64%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.30%	12.95%	+1.35%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.50%	15.32%	+4.18%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.12%	15.68%	+5.44%

RPFRX vs. IRFIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RPFRX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than IRFIX's 1.00% expense ratio.

Dividends

RPFRX vs. IRFIX - Dividend Comparison

RPFRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.69%, more than IRFIX's 6.20% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IRFIX Cohen & Steers International Realty Fund	6.20%	6.17%	3.24%	2.62%	2.62%	7.70%	3.40%	9.81%	4.19%	3.37%	6.46%	3.36%
RPFRX Davis Real Estate Fund	6.69%	6.48%	1.43%	2.26%	5.33%	1.05%	1.77%	2.78%	6.03%	5.84%	1.61%	1.19%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RPFRX and IRFIX in my portfolio?

RPFRX and IRFIX have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RPFRX or IRFIX?

RPFRX has higher volatility (4.43%) compared to IRFIX (3.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RPFRX dropped -75.01% vs IRFIX's -70.13%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IRFIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.50 vs 0.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.