RPFRX vs. RPFCX
RPFRX (Davis Real Estate Fund) and RPFCX (Davis Appreciation & Income Fund) are both mutual funds - RPFRX is a REIT fund managed by Davis Funds, while RPFCX is a Diversified Portfolio fund managed by Davis Funds. Over the past 10 years, RPFRX returned 3.91%/yr vs 10.68%/yr for RPFCX. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RPFRX charges 0.95%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for RPFCX.
Performance
RPFRX vs. RPFCX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with RPFRX having a 10.11% return and RPFCX slightly lower at 9.77%. Over the past 10 years, RPFRX has underperformed RPFCX with an annualized return of 3.91%, while RPFCX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.68% annualized return.
RPFRX
- 1D
- 0.55%
- 1M
- 1.45%
- YTD
- 10.11%
- 6M
- 10.53%
- 1Y
- 5.30%
- 3Y*
- 4.64%
- 5Y*
- 0.07%
- 10Y*
- 3.91%
RPFCX
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- 0.92%
- YTD
- 9.77%
- 6M
- 9.45%
- 1Y
- 24.42%
- 3Y*
- 17.48%
- 5Y*
- 9.55%
- 10Y*
- 10.68%
RPFRX vs. RPFCX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RPFRX Davis Real Estate Fund | 10.11% | -6.17% | 2.30% | 10.48% | -26.78% | 43.26% | -8.25% | 25.39% | -4.52% | 8.32% |
RPFCX Davis Appreciation & Income Fund | 9.77% | 20.90% | 9.10% | 23.00% | -15.65% | 25.74% | 4.74% | 20.33% | -8.02% | 16.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between RPFRX and RPFCX is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 1994 | 0.64 |
The correlation between RPFRX and RPFCX shifts across timeframes, from 0.53 (10 years) to 0.64 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RPFRX vs. RPFCX — Risk / Return Rank
RPFRX
RPFCX
RPFRX vs. RPFCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Davis Real Estate Fund (RPFRX) and Davis Appreciation & Income Fund (RPFCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RPFRX | RPFCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.38 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.36 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 1.50 | -0.43 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.53 | 3.70 | -3.17 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.28 | 14.27 | -12.99 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RPFRX vs. RPFCX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RPFRX drawdown since its inception was -75.01%, which is greater than RPFCX's maximum drawdown of -56.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RPFRX and RPFCX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RPFRX | RPFCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -75.01% | -56.39% | -18.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.13% | -6.76% | -3.37% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.20% | -14.82% | -7.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.52% | -25.63% | -9.89% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.29% | -30.72% | -11.57% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.62% | -0.72% | -13.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.41% | -7.42% | -5.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.19% | 1.75% | +2.44% |
Volatility
RPFRX vs. RPFCX - Volatility Comparison
Davis Real Estate Fund (RPFRX) has a higher volatility of 4.97% compared to Davis Appreciation & Income Fund (RPFCX) at 2.68%. This indicates that RPFRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RPFCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RPFRX | RPFCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.97% | 2.68% | +2.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.69% | 6.80% | +3.89% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.78% | 9.13% | +5.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.55% | 14.10% | +5.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.15% | 14.78% | +6.37% |
RPFRX vs. RPFCX - Expense Ratio Comparison
RPFRX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than RPFCX's 1.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
RPFRX vs. RPFCX - Dividend Comparison
RPFRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.54%, more than RPFCX's 5.88% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RPFCX Davis Appreciation & Income Fund | 5.88% | 6.09% | 1.11% | 2.91% | 2.63% | 0.28% | 0.78% | 2.03% | 1.09% | 0.83% | 1.09% | 1.19% |
RPFRX Davis Real Estate Fund | 6.54% | 6.48% | 1.43% | 2.26% | 5.33% | 1.05% | 1.77% | 2.78% | 6.03% | 5.84% | 1.61% | 1.19% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RPFRX and RPFCX have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RPFRX has higher volatility (4.97%) compared to RPFCX (2.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RPFRX dropped -75.01% vs RPFCX's -56.39%.
RPFCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.75 vs 0.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RPFRX and RPFCX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer