FIKBX vs. FLC
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Advisor Financial Services Fund Class Z (FIKBX) and Flaherty & Crumrine Total Return Fund Inc (FLC).
FIKBX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Oct 2, 2018. FLC is an actively managed fund by Flaherty & Crumrine. It was launched on Aug 29, 2003.
Performance
FIKBX vs. FLC - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FIKBX vs. FLC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIKBX Fidelity Advisor Financial Services Fund Class Z | -9.34% | 15.36% | 32.80% | 14.47% | -8.58% | 33.43% | 0.18% | 34.31% | -11.43% |
FLC Flaherty & Crumrine Total Return Fund Inc | -3.43% | 12.38% | 23.05% | -0.83% | -25.11% | 2.82% | 14.12% | 38.65% | -3.00% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FIKBX achieves a -9.34% return, which is significantly lower than FLC's -3.43% return.
FIKBX
- 1D
- 1.00%
- 1M
- -5.35%
- YTD
- -9.34%
- 6M
- -5.78%
- 1Y
- 4.82%
- 3Y*
- 19.08%
- 5Y*
- 10.36%
- 10Y*
- —
FLC
- 1D
- 1.59%
- 1M
- -5.90%
- YTD
- -3.43%
- 6M
- -3.32%
- 1Y
- 6.24%
- 3Y*
- 11.79%
- 5Y*
- -0.62%
- 10Y*
- 5.33%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FIKBX vs. FLC - Expense Ratio Comparison
FIKBX has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is lower than FLC's 1.64% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FIKBX vs. FLC — Risk / Return Rank
FIKBX
FLC
FIKBX vs. FLC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Financial Services Fund Class Z (FIKBX) and Flaherty & Crumrine Total Return Fund Inc (FLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FIKBX | FLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.27 | 0.55 | -0.28 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.50 | 0.75 | -0.25 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 1.14 | -0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.25 | 0.70 | -0.46 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.77 | 2.71 | -1.93 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FIKBX | FLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.27 | 0.55 | -0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 | -0.04 | +0.55 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.24 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.46 | 0.28 | +0.18 |
Correlation
The correlation between FIKBX and FLC is 0.34, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
FIKBX vs. FLC - Dividend Comparison
FIKBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.85%, more than FLC's 7.36% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIKBX Fidelity Advisor Financial Services Fund Class Z | 7.85% | 7.11% | 5.04% | 2.48% | 6.20% | 4.43% | 2.78% | 1.59% | 4.47% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FLC Flaherty & Crumrine Total Return Fund Inc | 7.36% | 6.81% | 6.62% | 7.38% | 8.95% | 6.86% | 6.27% | 6.31% | 8.34% | 7.22% | 8.20% | 8.51% |
Drawdowns
FIKBX vs. FLC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FIKBX drawdown since its inception was -45.95%, smaller than the maximum FLC drawdown of -76.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIKBX and FLC.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FIKBX | FLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.95% | -76.79% | +30.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.41% | -8.69% | -5.72% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.82% | -40.14% | +15.32% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -55.27% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.09% | -6.77% | -5.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.17% | -10.92% | +2.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.61% | 2.26% | +2.35% |
Volatility
FIKBX vs. FLC - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Advisor Financial Services Fund Class Z (FIKBX) has a higher volatility of 4.52% compared to Flaherty & Crumrine Total Return Fund Inc (FLC) at 4.25%. This indicates that FIKBX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FIKBX | FLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.52% | 4.25% | +0.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.43% | 5.78% | +6.65% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.14% | 11.34% | +9.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.79% | 14.23% | +6.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.15% | 22.06% | +4.09% |