FIKBX vs. ICFSX
FIKBX (Fidelity Advisor Financial Services Fund Class Z) and ICFSX (ICON Consumer Select Fund) are both Financials Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, FIKBX returned 12.65%/yr vs 9.61%/yr for ICFSX. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FIKBX charges 0.64%/yr vs 1.32%/yr for ICFSX.
Performance
FIKBX vs. ICFSX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FIKBX achieves a 2.25% return, which is significantly higher than ICFSX's -3.68% return.
FIKBX
- 1D
- -0.37%
- 1M
- 3.63%
- YTD
- 2.25%
- 6M
- 0.63%
- 1Y
- 14.49%
- 3Y*
- 22.66%
- 5Y*
- 12.65%
- 10Y*
- —
ICFSX
- 1D
- -0.56%
- 1M
- -0.45%
- YTD
- -3.68%
- 6M
- -5.01%
- 1Y
- 5.09%
- 3Y*
- 14.54%
- 5Y*
- 9.61%
- 10Y*
- 10.76%
FIKBX vs. ICFSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIKBX Fidelity Advisor Financial Services Fund Class Z | 2.25% | 15.36% | 32.80% | 14.47% | -8.58% | 33.43% | 0.18% | 34.31% | -11.43% |
ICFSX ICON Consumer Select Fund | -3.68% | 5.96% | 35.19% | 18.16% | -10.30% | 22.79% | -7.47% | 36.93% | -16.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between FIKBX and ICFSX is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2018 | 0.86 |
The correlation between FIKBX and ICFSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FIKBX vs. ICFSX — Risk / Return Rank
FIKBX
ICFSX
FIKBX vs. ICFSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Financial Services Fund Class Z (FIKBX) and ICON Consumer Select Fund (ICFSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FIKBX | ICFSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.55 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.69 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.07 | +0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.15 | 0.42 | +0.73 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.27 | 1.10 | +2.17 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FIKBX vs. ICFSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FIKBX drawdown since its inception was -45.95%, smaller than the maximum ICFSX drawdown of -77.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIKBX and ICFSX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FIKBX | ICFSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.95% | -77.40% | +31.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.96% | -12.67% | -0.29% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.38% | -20.61% | +1.23% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.82% | -23.27% | -1.55% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -48.50% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.16% | -6.81% | +5.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.06% | -21.34% | +13.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.54% | 4.82% | -0.28% |
Volatility
FIKBX vs. ICFSX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Advisor Financial Services Fund Class Z (FIKBX) has a higher volatility of 4.49% compared to ICON Consumer Select Fund (ICFSX) at 3.81%. This indicates that FIKBX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ICFSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FIKBX | ICFSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.49% | 3.81% | +0.68% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.18% | 10.50% | +1.68% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.04% | 14.07% | +1.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.72% | 20.43% | +0.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.89% | 23.75% | +2.14% |
FIKBX vs. ICFSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FIKBX has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is lower than ICFSX's 1.32% expense ratio.
Dividends
FIKBX vs. ICFSX - Dividend Comparison
FIKBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.96%, less than ICFSX's 11.68% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIKBX Fidelity Advisor Financial Services Fund Class Z | 6.96% | 7.11% | 5.04% | 2.48% | 6.20% | 4.43% | 2.78% | 1.59% | 4.47% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ICFSX ICON Consumer Select Fund | 11.68% | 11.25% | 34.59% | 7.32% | 17.71% | 10.98% | 0.00% | 1.94% | 0.75% | 0.21% | 0.97% | 0.59% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FIKBX and ICFSX have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FIKBX has higher volatility (4.49%) compared to ICFSX (3.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIKBX dropped -45.95% vs ICFSX's -77.40%.
FIKBX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.93 vs 0.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FIKBX and ICFSX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer