PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RPFCX vs. DILAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RPFCX vs. DILAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Davis Appreciation & Income Fund (RPFCX) and Davis International Fund (DILAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RPFCX achieves a 7.72% return, which is significantly higher than DILAX's 5.85% return. Over the past 10 years, RPFCX has outperformed DILAX with an annualized return of 10.17%, while DILAX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.63% annualized return.


RPFCX

1D
0.42%
1M
1.14%
YTD
7.72%
6M
9.18%
1Y
23.75%
3Y*
17.12%
5Y*
8.87%
10Y*
10.17%

DILAX

1D
1.66%
1M
6.29%
YTD
5.85%
6M
9.88%
1Y
24.40%
3Y*
20.57%
5Y*
4.11%
10Y*
7.63%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RPFCX vs. DILAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RPFCX
Davis Appreciation & Income Fund
7.72%20.90%9.10%23.00%-15.65%25.74%4.74%20.33%-8.02%16.35%
DILAX
Davis International Fund
5.85%30.70%21.56%5.12%-11.47%-22.00%22.69%26.58%-20.97%38.09%

Correlation

The correlation between RPFCX and DILAX is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.57

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 8, 2007

0.69

The correlation between RPFCX and DILAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.55 (1 year) to 0.69 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RPFCX vs. DILAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RPFCX
RPFCX Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
RPFCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RPFCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
RPFCX Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
RPFCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
RPFCX Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

DILAX
DILAX Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
DILAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DILAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
DILAX Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
DILAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
DILAX Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RPFCX vs. DILAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Davis Appreciation & Income Fund (RPFCX) and Davis International Fund (DILAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RPFCXDILAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.89

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.26

+0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.57

1.72

+1.85

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.82

5.58

+8.24

RPFCX vs. DILAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RPFCX Sharpe Ratio is 2.68, which is higher than the DILAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RPFCX and DILAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RPFCXDILAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.68

1.38

+1.30

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

0.18

+0.45

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

0.37

+0.32

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.58

0.19

+0.39

Drawdowns

RPFCX vs. DILAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RPFCX drawdown since its inception was -56.39%, smaller than the maximum DILAX drawdown of -65.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RPFCX and DILAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RPFCXDILAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.39%

-65.42%

+9.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.76%

-14.00%

+7.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.82%

-21.52%

+6.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.63%

-46.82%

+21.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.72%

-51.66%

+20.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.44%

0.00%

-1.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.43%

-22.21%

+14.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.74%

4.30%

-2.56%

Volatility

RPFCX vs. DILAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Davis Appreciation & Income Fund (RPFCX) is 2.29%, while Davis International Fund (DILAX) has a volatility of 6.25%. This indicates that RPFCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DILAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RPFCXDILAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.29%

6.25%

-3.96%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.59%

13.72%

-7.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.01%

17.45%

-8.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.10%

22.98%

-8.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.78%

20.95%

-6.17%

RPFCX vs. DILAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both RPFCX and DILAX have an expense ratio of 1.00%.


Dividends

RPFCX vs. DILAX - Dividend Comparison

RPFCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.99%, more than DILAX's 0.77% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DILAX
Davis International Fund
0.77%0.82%2.22%1.55%0.00%1.38%0.00%3.28%2.47%0.11%0.17%3.81%
RPFCX
Davis Appreciation & Income Fund
5.99%6.09%1.11%2.91%2.63%0.28%0.78%2.03%1.09%0.83%1.09%1.19%

Frequently Asked Questions


RPFCX and DILAX have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DILAX has higher volatility (6.25%) compared to RPFCX (2.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RPFCX dropped -56.39% vs DILAX's -65.42%.

RPFCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.68 vs 1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RPFCX and DILAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer