PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RPBAX vs. TRRHX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RPBAX vs. TRRHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Balanced Fund (RPBAX) and T. Rowe Price Retirement 2025 Fund (TRRHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with RPBAX having a 6.87% return and TRRHX slightly higher at 6.92%. Over the past 10 years, RPBAX has outperformed TRRHX with an annualized return of 8.85%, while TRRHX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.87% annualized return.


RPBAX

1D
0.23%
1M
2.83%
YTD
6.87%
6M
7.44%
1Y
18.04%
3Y*
14.55%
5Y*
7.31%
10Y*
8.85%

TRRHX

1D
0.27%
1M
2.72%
YTD
6.92%
6M
1.18%
1Y
9.65%
3Y*
10.43%
5Y*
4.73%
10Y*
7.87%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RPBAX vs. TRRHX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RPBAX
T. Rowe Price Balanced Fund
6.87%16.06%11.71%18.01%-17.28%13.29%14.54%20.75%-4.89%12.58%
TRRHX
T. Rowe Price Retirement 2025 Fund
6.92%6.59%9.71%14.63%-15.59%12.02%14.68%20.96%-5.68%17.69%

Correlation

The correlation between RPBAX and TRRHX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 2, 2004

0.98

The correlation between RPBAX and TRRHX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RPBAX vs. TRRHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RPBAX
RPBAX Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
RPBAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RPBAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
RPBAX Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
RPBAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
RPBAX Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

TRRHX
TRRHX Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
TRRHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRRHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRRHX Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
TRRHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRRHX Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RPBAX vs. TRRHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Balanced Fund (RPBAX) and T. Rowe Price Retirement 2025 Fund (TRRHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RPBAXTRRHXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.71

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.25

+0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.55

1.29

+1.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.36

3.91

+7.45

RPBAX vs. TRRHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RPBAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.19, which is higher than the TRRHX Sharpe Ratio of 1.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RPBAX and TRRHX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RPBAXTRRHXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.19

1.15

+1.04

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

0.48

+0.19

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.76

0.73

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.71

0.51

+0.19

Drawdowns

RPBAX vs. TRRHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RPBAX drawdown since its inception was -40.79%, smaller than the maximum TRRHX drawdown of -50.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RPBAX and TRRHX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RPBAXTRRHXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.79%

-50.04%

+9.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.15%

-7.80%

+0.65%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.43%

-8.69%

-1.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.45%

-22.00%

-1.45%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.49%

-26.42%

+0.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.15%

-5.78%

+1.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.60%

2.54%

-0.94%

Volatility

RPBAX vs. TRRHX - Volatility Comparison

T. Rowe Price Balanced Fund (RPBAX) has a higher volatility of 2.61% compared to T. Rowe Price Retirement 2025 Fund (TRRHX) at 2.21%. This indicates that RPBAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TRRHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RPBAXTRRHXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.61%

2.21%

+0.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.88%

7.84%

-0.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.32%

8.73%

-0.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.97%

9.96%

+1.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.63%

10.83%

+0.80%

RPBAX vs. TRRHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RPBAX has a 0.57% expense ratio, which is higher than TRRHX's 0.55% expense ratio.


Dividends

RPBAX vs. TRRHX - Dividend Comparison

RPBAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.92%, while TRRHX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RPBAX
T. Rowe Price Balanced Fund
6.92%7.30%7.28%3.80%5.03%9.33%4.59%3.41%8.42%1.69%2.96%7.32%
TRRHX
T. Rowe Price Retirement 2025 Fund
0.00%0.00%4.13%6.58%12.69%10.87%5.21%4.95%7.52%3.70%2.00%3.11%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, RPBAX and TRRHX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

RPBAX has higher volatility (2.61%) compared to TRRHX (2.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RPBAX dropped -40.79% vs TRRHX's -50.04%.

RPBAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.19 vs 1.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RPBAX and TRRHX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer