PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TRRHX vs. DFUSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TRRHX vs. DFUSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Retirement 2025 Fund (TRRHX) and DFA U.S. Large Company Portfolio (DFUSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TRRHX achieves a 6.12% return, which is significantly lower than DFUSX's 9.37% return. Over the past 10 years, TRRHX has underperformed DFUSX with an annualized return of 7.50%, while DFUSX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.86% annualized return.


TRRHX

1D
0.92%
1M
-0.32%
6M
3.37%
YTD
6.12%
1Y
6.55%
3Y*
8.71%
5Y*
4.22%
10Y*
7.50%
ALL TIME*
6.99%

DFUSX

1D
1.67%
1M
-0.56%
6M
7.80%
YTD
9.37%
1Y
20.58%
3Y*
18.99%
5Y*
12.63%
10Y*
14.86%
ALL TIME*
8.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

TRRHX vs. DFUSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TRRHX
T. Rowe Price Retirement 2025 Fund
6.12%6.59%9.71%14.63%-15.59%12.02%14.68%20.96%-5.68%17.69%
DFUSX
DFA U.S. Large Company Portfolio
9.37%17.76%24.91%26.28%-18.14%28.53%18.41%32.08%-4.45%21.04%

Correlation

The correlation between TRRHX and DFUSX is 0.87, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.87

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.90

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 1, 2004

0.94

The correlation between TRRHX and DFUSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TRRHX vs. DFUSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TRRHX
TRRHX Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
TRRHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRRHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRRHX Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
TRRHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRRHX Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

DFUSX
DFUSX Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
DFUSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFUSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFUSX Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
DFUSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFUSX Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TRRHX vs. DFUSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Retirement 2025 Fund (TRRHX) and DFA U.S. Large Company Portfolio (DFUSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TRRHXDFUSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.82

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.26

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.76

2.08

-1.32

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.28

8.94

-6.66

TRRHX vs. DFUSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TRRHX Sharpe Ratio is 0.64, which is lower than the DFUSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TRRHX and DFUSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TRRHX vs. DFUSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TRRHX drawdown since its inception was -50.04%, smaller than the maximum DFUSX drawdown of -54.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRRHX and DFUSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TRRHXDFUSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.04%

-54.96%

+4.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.80%

-8.88%

+1.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.69%

-18.76%

+10.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.00%

-24.58%

+2.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.42%

-33.79%

+7.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.85%

-2.09%

+1.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.74%

-10.55%

+4.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.57%

2.06%

+0.51%

Volatility

TRRHX vs. DFUSX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for T. Rowe Price Retirement 2025 Fund (TRRHX) is 1.98%, while DFA U.S. Large Company Portfolio (DFUSX) has a volatility of 3.45%. This indicates that TRRHX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DFUSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TRRHXDFUSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.98%

3.45%

-1.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.44%

10.12%

-3.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.23%

12.60%

-3.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.02%

16.99%

-6.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.75%

18.07%

-7.32%

TRRHX vs. DFUSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TRRHX has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than DFUSX's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

TRRHX vs. DFUSX - Dividend Comparison

TRRHX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DFUSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.99%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DFUSX
DFA U.S. Large Company Portfolio
0.99%1.04%1.24%4.17%6.24%6.57%3.82%2.74%2.64%1.56%1.95%2.87%
TRRHX
T. Rowe Price Retirement 2025 Fund
0.00%0.00%4.13%6.58%12.69%10.87%5.21%4.95%7.52%3.70%2.00%3.11%

Frequently Asked Questions


TRRHX and DFUSX have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DFUSX has higher volatility (3.45%) compared to TRRHX (1.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TRRHX dropped -50.04% vs DFUSX's -54.96%.

DFUSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.47 vs 0.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TRRHX and DFUSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer