PortfoliosLab logo
RPBAX vs. PRDGX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between RPBAX and PRDGX is 0.95, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


-0.50.00.51.0
Correlation: 1.0

Performance

RPBAX vs. PRDGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Balanced Fund (RPBAX) and T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth Fund, Inc. (PRDGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

900.00%950.00%1,000.00%1,050.00%1,100.00%1,150.00%1,200.00%1,250.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
982.85%
1,086.87%
RPBAX
PRDGX

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

RPBAX:

0.73

PRDGX:

0.22

Sortino Ratio

RPBAX:

1.09

PRDGX:

0.41

Omega Ratio

RPBAX:

1.15

PRDGX:

1.06

Calmar Ratio

RPBAX:

0.81

PRDGX:

0.21

Martin Ratio

RPBAX:

3.72

PRDGX:

0.73

Ulcer Index

RPBAX:

2.27%

PRDGX:

4.75%

Daily Std Dev

RPBAX:

11.62%

PRDGX:

15.99%

Max Drawdown

RPBAX:

-40.32%

PRDGX:

-52.60%

Current Drawdown

RPBAX:

-3.57%

PRDGX:

-9.25%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RPBAX achieves a 0.53% return, which is significantly higher than PRDGX's -0.64% return. Over the past 10 years, RPBAX has underperformed PRDGX with an annualized return of 6.49%, while PRDGX has yielded a comparatively higher 8.86% annualized return.


RPBAX

YTD

0.53%

1M

-1.34%

6M

-0.36%

1Y

8.92%

5Y*

9.46%

10Y*

6.49%

PRDGX

YTD

-0.64%

1M

-3.23%

6M

-5.77%

1Y

3.34%

5Y*

11.60%

10Y*

8.86%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


RPBAX vs. PRDGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RPBAX has a 0.57% expense ratio, which is lower than PRDGX's 0.62% expense ratio.


Expense ratio chart for PRDGX: current value is 0.62%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
PRDGX: 0.62%
Expense ratio chart for RPBAX: current value is 0.57%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
RPBAX: 0.57%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

RPBAX vs. PRDGX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RPBAX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of RPBAX is 7373
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of RPBAX is 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of RPBAX is 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of RPBAX is 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of RPBAX is 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of RPBAX is 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

PRDGX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of PRDGX is 3636
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of PRDGX is 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of PRDGX is 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of PRDGX is 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of PRDGX is 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of PRDGX is 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

RPBAX vs. PRDGX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Balanced Fund (RPBAX) and T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth Fund, Inc. (PRDGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The chart of Sharpe ratio for RPBAX, currently valued at 0.73, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.00
RPBAX: 0.73
PRDGX: 0.22
The chart of Sortino ratio for RPBAX, currently valued at 1.09, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.00
RPBAX: 1.09
PRDGX: 0.41
The chart of Omega ratio for RPBAX, currently valued at 1.15, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.00
RPBAX: 1.15
PRDGX: 1.06
The chart of Calmar ratio for RPBAX, currently valued at 0.81, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.00
RPBAX: 0.81
PRDGX: 0.21
The chart of Martin ratio for RPBAX, currently valued at 3.72, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.0040.00
RPBAX: 3.72
PRDGX: 0.73

The current RPBAX Sharpe Ratio is 0.73, which is higher than the PRDGX Sharpe Ratio of 0.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RPBAX and PRDGX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.00NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
0.73
0.22
RPBAX
PRDGX

Dividends

RPBAX vs. PRDGX - Dividend Comparison

RPBAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.25%, more than PRDGX's 1.04% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
RPBAX
T. Rowe Price Balanced Fund
7.25%7.28%3.80%5.03%9.33%4.59%3.41%8.42%2.14%3.37%7.32%7.43%
PRDGX
T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth Fund, Inc.
1.04%1.02%1.16%1.14%0.78%1.03%1.24%1.76%1.22%1.53%1.78%1.30%

Drawdowns

RPBAX vs. PRDGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RPBAX drawdown since its inception was -40.32%, smaller than the maximum PRDGX drawdown of -52.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RPBAX and PRDGX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-3.57%
-9.25%
RPBAX
PRDGX

Volatility

RPBAX vs. PRDGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for T. Rowe Price Balanced Fund (RPBAX) is 8.21%, while T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth Fund, Inc. (PRDGX) has a volatility of 11.84%. This indicates that RPBAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PRDGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
8.21%
11.84%
RPBAX
PRDGX