PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RPBAX vs. CONWX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

RPBAX vs. CONWX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Balanced Fund (RPBAX) and Concorde Wealth Management Fund (CONWX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

RPBAX vs. CONWX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RPBAX
T. Rowe Price Balanced Fund
-3.21%16.06%11.71%18.01%-17.28%13.29%14.54%20.75%-4.89%12.58%
CONWX
Concorde Wealth Management Fund
8.18%11.95%13.58%0.20%-2.51%19.73%8.76%16.84%-1.95%7.17%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RPBAX achieves a -3.21% return, which is significantly lower than CONWX's 8.18% return. Over the past 10 years, RPBAX has underperformed CONWX with an annualized return of 7.99%, while CONWX has yielded a comparatively higher 8.62% annualized return.


RPBAX

1D
0.07%
1M
-6.89%
YTD
-3.21%
6M
-0.84%
1Y
11.14%
3Y*
11.85%
5Y*
6.11%
10Y*
7.99%

CONWX

1D
-0.62%
1M
-1.70%
YTD
8.18%
6M
11.51%
1Y
17.28%
3Y*
12.45%
5Y*
7.53%
10Y*
8.62%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


RPBAX vs. CONWX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RPBAX has a 0.57% expense ratio, which is lower than CONWX's 1.41% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

RPBAX vs. CONWX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RPBAX
RPBAX Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
RPBAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RPBAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
RPBAX Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
RPBAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
RPBAX Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

CONWX
CONWX Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
CONWX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CONWX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
CONWX Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
CONWX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
CONWX Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RPBAX vs. CONWX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Balanced Fund (RPBAX) and Concorde Wealth Management Fund (CONWX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RPBAXCONWXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.04

1.70

-0.67

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.51

2.36

-0.85

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.37

-0.15

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.23

1.99

-0.76

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.55

11.30

-5.75

RPBAX vs. CONWX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RPBAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.04, which is lower than the CONWX Sharpe Ratio of 1.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RPBAX and CONWX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RPBAXCONWXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.04

1.70

-0.67

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

0.74

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

0.78

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.69

0.78

-0.10

Correlation

The correlation between RPBAX and CONWX is 0.76, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

RPBAX vs. CONWX - Dividend Comparison

RPBAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.64%, more than CONWX's 3.41% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RPBAX
T. Rowe Price Balanced Fund
7.64%7.30%7.28%3.80%5.03%9.33%4.59%3.41%8.42%1.69%2.96%7.32%
CONWX
Concorde Wealth Management Fund
3.41%3.69%10.55%2.16%7.85%3.63%3.86%2.16%5.09%2.48%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

RPBAX vs. CONWX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RPBAX drawdown since its inception was -40.79%, which is greater than CONWX's maximum drawdown of -26.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RPBAX and CONWX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


RPBAXCONWXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.79%

-26.09%

-14.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.19%

-8.60%

+0.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.45%

-12.49%

-10.96%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.49%

-26.09%

+0.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.08%

-2.03%

-5.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.16%

-2.78%

-1.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.84%

1.52%

+0.32%

Volatility

RPBAX vs. CONWX - Volatility Comparison

T. Rowe Price Balanced Fund (RPBAX) has a higher volatility of 3.65% compared to Concorde Wealth Management Fund (CONWX) at 2.12%. This indicates that RPBAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CONWX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


RPBAXCONWXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.65%

2.12%

+1.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.11%

5.43%

+0.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.01%

10.70%

+0.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.90%

10.26%

+0.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.58%

11.15%

+0.43%