RPAR vs. SFY
RPAR (RPAR Risk Parity ETF) and SFY (SoFi Select 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RPAR is a Hedge Fund fund actively managed by Toroso Investments, while SFY is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Solactive SoFi US 500 Growth Index. RPAR is actively managed, while SFY is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, RPAR returned 1.76%/yr vs 15.86%/yr for SFY. A 0.50 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RPAR charges 0.51%/yr vs 0.00%/yr for SFY.
Performance
RPAR vs. SFY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RPAR achieves a 7.53% return, which is significantly lower than SFY's 14.51% return.
RPAR
- 1D
- -0.47%
- 1M
- 1.78%
- YTD
- 7.53%
- 6M
- 7.10%
- 1Y
- 21.22%
- 3Y*
- 9.22%
- 5Y*
- 1.76%
- 10Y*
- —
SFY
- 1D
- -1.03%
- 1M
- 7.58%
- YTD
- 14.51%
- 6M
- 14.56%
- 1Y
- 35.49%
- 3Y*
- 27.51%
- 5Y*
- 15.86%
- 10Y*
- —
RPAR vs. SFY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RPAR RPAR Risk Parity ETF | 7.53% | 17.91% | 0.06% | 6.03% | -22.82% | 7.56% | 19.40% | 0.11% |
SFY SoFi Select 500 ETF | 14.51% | 22.67% | 29.81% | 29.36% | -22.84% | 28.03% | 24.52% | 2.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between RPAR and SFY is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2019 | 0.50 |
The correlation between RPAR and SFY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.49 to 0.54 - a consistent structural relationship.
RPAR vs. SFY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
RPAR
SFY
Financial Services
Basic Materials
Energy
Healthcare
Communication Services
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Financial Services
RPAR
SFY
Basic Materials
RPAR
SFY
Energy
RPAR
SFY
Healthcare
RPAR
SFY
Communication Services
RPAR
SFY
Industrials
RPAR
SFY
Consumer Defensive
RPAR
SFY
Utilities
RPAR
SFY
Technology
RPAR
SFY
Consumer Cyclical
RPAR
SFY
Real Estate
RPAR
SFY
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RPAR vs. SFY — Risk / Return Rank
RPAR
SFY
RPAR vs. SFY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RPAR Risk Parity ETF (RPAR) and SoFi Select 500 ETF (SFY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RPAR | SFY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.38 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.36 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.43 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.63 | 3.31 | -0.68 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.71 | 14.43 | -5.72 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RPAR | SFY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.09 | 2.47 | -0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.14 | 0.84 | -0.70 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.36 | 0.90 | -0.54 |
Drawdowns
RPAR vs. SFY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RPAR drawdown since its inception was -30.16%, smaller than the maximum SFY drawdown of -33.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RPAR and SFY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RPAR | SFY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.16% | -33.25% | +3.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.10% | -10.79% | +2.69% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.20% | -21.04% | +7.84% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.16% | -27.72% | -2.44% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.64% | -1.03% | -1.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.61% | -6.19% | -5.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.44% | 2.47% | -0.03% |
Volatility
RPAR vs. SFY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for RPAR Risk Parity ETF (RPAR) is 3.56%, while SoFi Select 500 ETF (SFY) has a volatility of 4.04%. This indicates that RPAR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SFY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RPAR | SFY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.56% | 4.04% | -0.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.37% | 11.09% | -2.72% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.20% | 14.45% | -4.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.40% | 19.02% | -6.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.69% | 20.20% | -7.51% |
RPAR vs. SFY - Expense Ratio Comparison
RPAR has a 0.51% expense ratio, which is higher than SFY's 0.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
RPAR vs. SFY - Dividend Comparison
RPAR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.07%, more than SFY's 0.84% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RPAR RPAR Risk Parity ETF | 2.07% | 2.55% | 2.51% | 3.16% | 4.01% | 2.02% | 0.76% | 0.23% |
SFY SoFi Select 500 ETF | 0.84% | 0.96% | 0.99% | 1.40% | 1.61% | 0.90% | 1.18% | 1.02% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RPAR and SFY have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SFY has higher volatility (4.04%) compared to RPAR (3.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RPAR dropped -30.16% vs SFY's -33.25%.
On 5-year performance, SFY leads with 15.86% vs 1.76% for RPAR. On fees, SFY is cheaper at 0.00% per year. On volatility, RPAR has been the lower-risk option at 3.56%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SFY has performed better with a 15.86% return vs 1.76%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SFY is cheaper with a 0.00% expense ratio, compared with 0.51% for RPAR.
RPAR has the higher dividend yield at 2.07%, compared with 0.84% for SFY.
RPAR is categorized as Hedge Fund, while SFY is Large Cap Growth Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.51% for RPAR and 0.00% for SFY.
SFY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.47 vs 2.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RPAR and SFY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer