ROUS vs. HQGO
Compare and contrast key facts about Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF (ROUS) and Hartford US Quality Growth ETF (HQGO).
ROUS and HQGO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ROUS is a passively managed fund by Hartford that tracks the performance of the Hartford Multi-factor Large Cap Index. It was launched on Feb 25, 2015. HQGO is a passively managed fund by Hartford that tracks the performance of the Hartford US Quality Growth Index - Benchmark TR Gross. It was launched on Dec 5, 2023. Both ROUS and HQGO are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
ROUS vs. HQGO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ROUS vs. HQGO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ROUS Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF | 3.48% | 15.21% | 17.61% | 4.52% |
HQGO Hartford US Quality Growth ETF | -4.85% | 15.15% | 25.09% | 6.12% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ROUS achieves a 3.48% return, which is significantly higher than HQGO's -4.85% return.
ROUS
- 1D
- 0.81%
- 1M
- -3.23%
- YTD
- 3.48%
- 6M
- 4.19%
- 1Y
- 19.00%
- 3Y*
- 16.25%
- 5Y*
- 11.21%
- 10Y*
- 11.74%
HQGO
- 1D
- 0.76%
- 1M
- -3.93%
- YTD
- -4.85%
- 6M
- -3.46%
- 1Y
- 16.95%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ROUS vs. HQGO - Expense Ratio Comparison
ROUS has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than HQGO's 0.34% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
ROUS vs. HQGO — Risk / Return Rank
ROUS
HQGO
ROUS vs. HQGO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF (ROUS) and Hartford US Quality Growth ETF (HQGO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ROUS | HQGO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.19 | 0.86 | +0.33 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.74 | 1.37 | +0.37 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.19 | +0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.67 | 1.45 | +0.23 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.37 | 5.95 | +2.42 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ROUS | HQGO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.19 | 0.86 | +0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.69 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.61 | 1.02 | -0.41 |
Correlation
The correlation between ROUS and HQGO is 0.85, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
ROUS vs. HQGO - Dividend Comparison
ROUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.49%, more than HQGO's 0.53% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ROUS Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF | 1.49% | 1.52% | 1.62% | 1.91% | 1.88% | 1.38% | 2.01% | 2.12% | 1.89% | 1.54% | 1.97% | 1.62% |
HQGO Hartford US Quality Growth ETF | 0.53% | 0.51% | 0.52% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
ROUS vs. HQGO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ROUS drawdown since its inception was -35.51%, which is greater than HQGO's maximum drawdown of -20.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROUS and HQGO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ROUS | HQGO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.51% | -20.85% | -14.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.44% | -12.12% | +0.68% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.91% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.51% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.36% | -6.95% | +3.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.30% | -2.63% | -1.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.29% | 2.95% | -0.66% |
Volatility
ROUS vs. HQGO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF (ROUS) is 4.07%, while Hartford US Quality Growth ETF (HQGO) has a volatility of 5.76%. This indicates that ROUS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HQGO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ROUS | HQGO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.07% | 5.76% | -1.69% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.82% | 10.84% | -2.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.05% | 19.92% | -3.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.36% | 17.30% | -2.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.94% | 17.30% | -0.36% |