ROSC vs. ESIX
ROSC (Hartford Multifactor Small Cap ETF) and ESIX (SPDR S&P SmallCap 600 ESG ETF) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds - ROSC tracks the ROSC-US - Hartford Multifactor Small Cap Index while ESIX tracks the S&P SmallCap 600 ESG Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, ROSC returned 15.86%/yr vs 14.39%/yr for ESIX. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. ROSC charges 0.34%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for ESIX.
Performance
ROSC vs. ESIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ROSC achieves a 11.71% return, which is significantly higher than ESIX's 10.83% return.
ROSC
- 1D
- -0.88%
- 1M
- 0.50%
- YTD
- 11.71%
- 6M
- 12.39%
- 1Y
- 30.49%
- 3Y*
- 15.86%
- 5Y*
- 8.05%
- 10Y*
- 10.48%
ESIX
- 1D
- -1.16%
- 1M
- -0.56%
- YTD
- 10.83%
- 6M
- 9.86%
- 1Y
- 22.21%
- 3Y*
- 14.39%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ROSC vs. ESIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ROSC Hartford Multifactor Small Cap ETF | 11.71% | 10.18% | 7.28% | 18.88% | -9.74% |
ESIX SPDR S&P SmallCap 600 ESG ETF | 10.83% | 1.83% | 9.66% | 17.51% | -14.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between ROSC and ESIX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 2022 | 0.96 |
The correlation between ROSC and ESIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
ROSC vs. ESIX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ROSC
ESIX
Healthcare
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Energy
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Utilities
Healthcare
ROSC
ESIX
Financial Services
ROSC
ESIX
Consumer Cyclical
ROSC
ESIX
Technology
ROSC
ESIX
Industrials
ROSC
ESIX
Consumer Defensive
ROSC
ESIX
Real Estate
ROSC
ESIX
Energy
ROSC
ESIX
Communication Services
ROSC
ESIX
Basic Materials
ROSC
ESIX
Utilities
ROSC
ESIX
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ROSC vs. ESIX — Risk / Return Rank
ROSC
ESIX
ROSC vs. ESIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hartford Multifactor Small Cap ETF (ROSC) and SPDR S&P SmallCap 600 ESG ETF (ESIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ROSC | ESIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.97 | 1.20 | +0.77 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.90 | 1.84 | +1.06 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.21 | +0.13 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.95 | 2.08 | +1.87 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.81 | 6.57 | +6.24 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ROSC | ESIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.97 | 1.20 | +0.77 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.52 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.46 | 0.24 | +0.22 |
Drawdowns
ROSC vs. ESIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ROSC drawdown since its inception was -43.13%, which is greater than ESIX's maximum drawdown of -27.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROSC and ESIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ROSC | ESIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.13% | -27.56% | -15.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.75% | -10.18% | +2.43% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.74% | -27.56% | +3.82% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.74% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.13% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.76% | -2.42% | +0.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.21% | -8.59% | +1.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.39% | 3.22% | -0.83% |
Volatility
ROSC vs. ESIX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Hartford Multifactor Small Cap ETF (ROSC) is 3.54%, while SPDR S&P SmallCap 600 ESG ETF (ESIX) has a volatility of 4.19%. This indicates that ROSC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ESIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ROSC | ESIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.54% | 4.19% | -0.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.30% | 12.40% | -2.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.56% | 17.99% | -2.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.32% | 21.53% | -2.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.28% | 21.53% | -1.25% |
ROSC vs. ESIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
ROSC has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is higher than ESIX's 0.12% expense ratio.
Dividends
ROSC vs. ESIX - Dividend Comparison
ROSC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.87%, more than ESIX's 1.45% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESIX SPDR S&P SmallCap 600 ESG ETF | 1.45% | 1.64% | 1.65% | 1.69% | 1.54% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ROSC Hartford Multifactor Small Cap ETF | 1.87% | 2.08% | 2.00% | 2.01% | 1.51% | 2.13% | 1.75% | 3.05% | 2.86% | 2.13% | 2.20% | 2.48% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, ROSC and ESIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
ESIX has higher volatility (4.19%) compared to ROSC (3.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ROSC dropped -43.13% vs ESIX's -27.56%.
On 3-year performance, ROSC leads with 15.86% vs 14.39% for ESIX. On fees, ESIX is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, ROSC has been the lower-risk option at 3.54%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, ROSC has performed better with a 15.86% return vs 14.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ESIX is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.34% for ROSC.
ROSC has the higher dividend yield at 1.87%, compared with 1.45% for ESIX.
ROSC tracks ROSC-US - Hartford Multifactor Small Cap Index, while ESIX tracks S&P SmallCap 600 ESG Index. They also come from different issuers: Hartford and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.34% for ROSC and 0.12% for ESIX.
ROSC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.97 vs 1.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ROSC and ESIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer