PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ROP vs. META
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ROP vs. META - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roper Technologies, Inc. (ROP) and Meta Platforms, Inc. (META). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ROP achieves a -24.40% return, which is significantly lower than META's -14.03% return. Over the past 10 years, ROP has underperformed META with an annualized return of 7.73%, while META has yielded a comparatively higher 17.39% annualized return.


ROP

1D
0.68%
1M
5.35%
YTD
-24.40%
6M
-24.53%
1Y
-39.80%
3Y*
-9.19%
5Y*
-5.54%
10Y*
7.73%

META

1D
-0.26%
1M
-8.32%
YTD
-14.03%
6M
-11.84%
1Y
-16.71%
3Y*
28.18%
5Y*
11.52%
10Y*
17.39%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ROP vs. META - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ROP
Roper Technologies, Inc.
-24.40%-13.85%-4.11%26.92%-11.64%14.69%22.39%33.66%3.51%42.39%
META
Meta Platforms, Inc.
-14.03%13.09%66.05%194.13%-64.22%23.13%33.09%56.57%-25.71%53.38%

Correlation

The correlation between ROP and META is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.07

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.22

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.33

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 18, 2012

0.32

Over the past year, the correlation between ROP and META has dropped to 0.07 - well below their long-term average of 0.32, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ROP:

$35.04B

META:

$1.45T

EPS

ROP:

$15.98

META:

$27.47

PE Ratio

ROP:

20.96

META:

20.64

PEG Ratio

ROP:

2.48

META:

0.85

PS Ratio

ROP:

4.43

META:

6.78

PB Ratio

ROP:

1.86

META:

5.97

Total Revenue (TTM)

ROP:

$8.12B

META:

$214.96B

Gross Profit (TTM)

ROP:

$5.63B

META:

$176.14B

EBITDA (TTM)

ROP:

$3.24B

META:

$106.31B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ROP vs. META — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ROP
ROP Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
ROP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ROP Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
ROP Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
ROP Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
ROP Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank

META
META Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
META Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
META Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
META Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
META Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
META Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ROP vs. META - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roper Technologies, Inc. (ROP) and Meta Platforms, Inc. (META). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ROPMETADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.83

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.70

0.93

-0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.92

-0.54

-0.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.51

-1.12

-0.39

ROP vs. META - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ROP Sharpe Ratio is -1.64, which is lower than the META Sharpe Ratio of -0.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ROP and META, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ROP vs. META - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ROP drawdown since its inception was -58.94%, smaller than the maximum META drawdown of -76.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROP and META.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ROPMETADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.94%

-76.74%

+17.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-44.65%

-33.30%

-11.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-46.51%

-34.15%

-12.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-46.51%

-76.74%

+30.23%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.51%

-76.74%

+30.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-43.07%

-28.06%

-15.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.43%

-15.83%

+4.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

27.25%

16.06%

+11.19%

Volatility

ROP vs. META - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Roper Technologies, Inc. (ROP) is 8.14%, while Meta Platforms, Inc. (META) has a volatility of 10.17%. This indicates that ROP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than META based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ROPMETADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.14%

10.17%

-2.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.59%

26.91%

-5.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.08%

35.52%

-10.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.39%

44.04%

-22.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.34%

38.67%

-15.33%

Dividends

ROP vs. META - Dividend Comparison

ROP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.04%, more than META's 0.37% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
META
Meta Platforms, Inc.
0.37%0.32%0.34%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ROP
Roper Technologies, Inc.
1.04%0.74%0.58%0.50%0.57%0.46%0.48%0.52%0.62%0.54%0.66%0.53%

Financials

ROP vs. META - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Roper Technologies, Inc. and Meta Platforms, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0010.00B20.00B30.00B40.00B50.00B60.00B20222023202420252026
2.10B
56.31B
(ROP) Total Revenue
(META) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

ROP vs. META - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Roper Technologies, Inc. and Meta Platforms, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

70.0%75.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
69.4%
81.9%
Portfolio components
ROP - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Roper Technologies, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.45B and revenue of 2.10B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 69.4%.

META - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Meta Platforms, Inc. reported a gross profit of 46.09B and revenue of 56.31B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 81.9%.

ROP - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Roper Technologies, Inc. reported an operating income of 569.60M and revenue of 2.10B, resulting in an operating margin of 27.2%.

META - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Meta Platforms, Inc. reported an operating income of 22.87B and revenue of 56.31B, resulting in an operating margin of 40.6%.

ROP - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Roper Technologies, Inc. reported a net income of 508.90M and revenue of 2.10B, resulting in a net margin of 24.3%.

META - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Meta Platforms, Inc. reported a net income of 26.77B and revenue of 56.31B, resulting in a net margin of 47.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


ROP and META have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

META has higher volatility (10.17%) compared to ROP (8.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ROP dropped -58.94% vs META's -76.74%.

META currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.51 vs -1.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ROP and META

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer