PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ROOT vs. XLV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ROOT vs. XLV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Root, Inc. (ROOT) and State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ROOT achieves a -17.44% return, which is significantly lower than XLV's 4.95% return.


ROOT

1D
0.34%
1M
22.95%
6M
-15.02%
YTD
-17.44%
1Y
-53.04%
3Y*
77.57%
5Y*
-16.25%
10Y*

XLV

1D
-0.44%
1M
7.36%
6M
4.32%
YTD
4.95%
1Y
23.50%
3Y*
8.65%
5Y*
6.31%
10Y*
9.92%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ROOT vs. XLV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
ROOT
Root, Inc.
-17.44%-0.50%592.65%133.41%-91.95%-80.27%-39.58%
XLV
State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF
4.95%14.50%2.47%2.07%-2.08%26.04%7.57%

Correlation

The correlation between ROOT and XLV is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.19

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2020

0.19

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ROOT vs. XLV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ROOT
ROOT Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
ROOT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ROOT Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
ROOT Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
ROOT Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
ROOT Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

XLV
XLV Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
XLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLV Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
XLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLV Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ROOT vs. XLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Root, Inc. (ROOT) and State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ROOTXLVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.88

1.26

-0.38

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.79

2.25

-3.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.11

5.33

-6.44

ROOT vs. XLV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ROOT Sharpe Ratio is -0.77, which is lower than the XLV Sharpe Ratio of 1.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ROOT and XLV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ROOT vs. XLV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ROOT drawdown since its inception was -99.29%, which is greater than XLV's maximum drawdown of -39.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROOT and XLV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ROOTXLVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.29%

-39.17%

-60.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-67.10%

-10.47%

-56.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-75.68%

-17.11%

-58.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-97.66%

-17.11%

-80.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-87.73%

-2.04%

-85.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-83.81%

-7.10%

-76.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

47.93%

4.42%

+43.51%

Volatility

ROOT vs. XLV - Volatility Comparison

Root, Inc. (ROOT) has a higher volatility of 26.13% compared to State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLV) at 6.44%. This indicates that ROOT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ROOTXLVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

26.13%

6.44%

+19.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

48.43%

11.87%

+36.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

69.52%

15.85%

+53.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

101.84%

14.99%

+86.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

99.76%

16.63%

+83.13%

Dividends

ROOT vs. XLV - Dividend Comparison

ROOT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.57%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ROOT
Root, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XLV
State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF
1.57%1.60%1.67%1.59%1.47%1.33%1.49%2.17%1.57%1.47%1.60%1.43%

Frequently Asked Questions


ROOT and XLV have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ROOT has higher volatility (26.13%) compared to XLV (6.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ROOT dropped -99.29% vs XLV's -39.17%.

XLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.49 vs -0.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ROOT and XLV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer