PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ROOT vs. BLOK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ROOT vs. BLOK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Root, Inc. (ROOT) and Amplify Blockchain Technology ETF (BLOK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ROOT achieves a -27.76% return, which is significantly lower than BLOK's 14.77% return.


ROOT

1D
2.17%
1M
-9.06%
YTD
-27.76%
6M
-28.65%
1Y
-60.23%
3Y*
68.13%
5Y*
-23.35%
10Y*

BLOK

1D
-1.82%
1M
2.14%
YTD
14.77%
6M
9.76%
1Y
27.49%
3Y*
48.25%
5Y*
11.69%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ROOT vs. BLOK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
ROOT
Root, Inc.
-27.76%-0.50%592.65%133.41%-91.95%-80.27%-39.58%
BLOK
Amplify Blockchain Technology ETF
14.77%32.64%53.12%99.62%-62.36%30.76%37.94%

Correlation

The correlation between ROOT and BLOK is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.37

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2020

0.43

The correlation between ROOT and BLOK shifts across timeframes, from 0.34 (1 year) to 0.46 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ROOT vs. BLOK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ROOT
ROOT Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
ROOT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ROOT Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
ROOT Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
ROOT Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
ROOT Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

BLOK
BLOK Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
BLOK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BLOK Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
BLOK Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
BLOK Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
BLOK Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ROOT vs. BLOK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Root, Inc. (ROOT) and Amplify Blockchain Technology ETF (BLOK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ROOTBLOKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.58

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.47

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.84

1.14

-0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.89

0.77

-1.67

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.29

1.67

-2.96

ROOT vs. BLOK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ROOT Sharpe Ratio is -0.88, which is lower than the BLOK Sharpe Ratio of 0.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ROOT and BLOK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ROOT vs. BLOK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ROOT drawdown since its inception was -99.29%, which is greater than BLOK's maximum drawdown of -73.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROOT and BLOK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ROOTBLOKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.29%

-73.33%

-25.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-67.76%

-35.64%

-32.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-75.68%

-35.64%

-40.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-98.26%

-73.33%

-24.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-89.26%

-11.27%

-77.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-83.76%

-25.99%

-57.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

46.77%

16.48%

+30.29%

Volatility

ROOT vs. BLOK - Volatility Comparison

Root, Inc. (ROOT) has a higher volatility of 24.39% compared to Amplify Blockchain Technology ETF (BLOK) at 12.42%. This indicates that ROOT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BLOK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ROOTBLOKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

24.39%

12.42%

+11.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

46.29%

29.64%

+16.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

68.92%

39.10%

+29.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

101.75%

42.53%

+59.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

100.07%

39.03%

+61.04%

Dividends

ROOT vs. BLOK - Dividend Comparison

ROOT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BLOK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.62%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
BLOK
Amplify Blockchain Technology ETF
0.62%0.72%6.00%1.15%0.00%14.31%1.88%2.05%1.30%
ROOT
Root, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ROOT and BLOK have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ROOT has higher volatility (24.39%) compared to BLOK (12.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ROOT dropped -99.29% vs BLOK's -73.33%.

BLOK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.71 vs -0.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ROOT and BLOK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer