ROOT vs. BLOK

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Root, Inc. (ROOT) and Amplify Transformational Data Sharing ETF (BLOK).

BLOK is an actively managed fund by Amplify. It was launched on Jan 16, 2018.

Performance

ROOT vs. BLOK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Root, Inc. (ROOT) and Amplify Transformational Data Sharing ETF (BLOK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

ROOT vs. BLOK - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
ROOT Root, Inc.	-40.11%	-0.50%	592.65%	133.41%	-91.95%	-80.27%	-41.81%
BLOK Amplify Transformational Data Sharing ETF	-12.20%	32.64%	53.12%	99.62%	-62.36%	30.76%	42.17%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ROOT achieves a -40.11% return, which is significantly lower than BLOK's -12.20% return.

ROOT

• 1D: -2.06%
• 1M: -12.73%
• YTD: -40.11%
• 6M: -50.86%
• 1Y: -66.36%
• 3Y*: 112.47%
• 5Y*: -27.73%
• 10Y*: —

BLOK

• 1D: 0.28%
• 1M: -8.06%
• YTD: -12.20%
• 6M: -25.52%
• 1Y: 32.40%
• 3Y*: 40.64%
• 5Y*: 1.56%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

ROOT vs. BLOK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ROOT

ROOT Risk / Return Rank: 6
ROOT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
ROOT Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
ROOT Omega Ratio Rank: 6
ROOT Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
ROOT Martin Ratio Rank: 8

BLOK

BLOK Risk / Return Rank: 38
BLOK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
BLOK Sortino Ratio Rank: 45
BLOK Omega Ratio Rank: 38
BLOK Calmar Ratio Rank: 38
BLOK Martin Ratio Rank: 29

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ROOT vs. BLOK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Root, Inc. (ROOT) and Amplify Transformational Data Sharing ETF (BLOK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ROOT	BLOK	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.94	0.77	-1.71
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-1.59	1.31	-2.90
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.81	1.16	-0.35
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.94	1.02	-1.96
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.55	2.49	-4.04
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ROOT vs. BLOK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ROOT Sharpe Ratio is -0.94, which is lower than the BLOK Sharpe Ratio of 0.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ROOT and BLOK, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ROOT	BLOK	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.94	0.77	-1.71
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.27	0.04	-0.31
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.36	0.39	-0.75

Correlation

The correlation between ROOT and BLOK is 0.43, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

ROOT vs. BLOK - Dividend Comparison

ROOT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BLOK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.82%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
ROOT Root, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
BLOK Amplify Transformational Data Sharing ETF	0.82%	0.72%	6.00%	1.15%	0.00%	14.31%	1.88%	2.05%	1.30%

Drawdowns

ROOT vs. BLOK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ROOT drawdown since its inception was -99.29%, which is greater than BLOK's maximum drawdown of -73.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROOT and BLOK.

Drawdown Indicators

	ROOT	BLOK	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.29%	-73.33%	-25.96%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-72.19%	-35.64%	-36.55%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-98.57%	-73.33%	-25.24%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-91.10%	-32.12%	-58.98%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-83.61%	-26.27%	-57.34%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	43.62%	14.58%	+29.04%

Volatility

ROOT vs. BLOK - Volatility Comparison

Root, Inc. (ROOT) has a higher volatility of 15.17% compared to Amplify Transformational Data Sharing ETF (BLOK) at 13.29%. This indicates that ROOT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BLOK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ROOT	BLOK	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	15.17%	13.29%	+1.88%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	45.11%	31.07%	+14.04%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	71.05%	42.46%	+28.59%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	101.88%	42.92%	+58.96%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	101.09%	39.05%	+62.04%