RONB vs. IUSG
RONB (Baron First Principles ETF) and IUSG (iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. RONB is actively managed, while IUSG is passively managed. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RONB charges 1.00%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for IUSG.
Performance
RONB vs. IUSG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RONB achieves a -6.63% return, which is significantly lower than IUSG's 9.19% return.
RONB
- 1D
- -0.34%
- 1M
- -1.56%
- YTD
- -6.63%
- 6M
- -8.36%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IUSG
- 1D
- -2.31%
- 1M
- -1.86%
- YTD
- 9.19%
- 6M
- 7.87%
- 1Y
- 26.96%
- 3Y*
- 25.00%
- 5Y*
- 13.77%
- 10Y*
- 17.77%
RONB vs. IUSG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
RONB Baron First Principles ETF | -6.63% | -0.76% |
IUSG iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF | 9.19% | 0.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between RONB and IUSG is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 15, 2025 | 0.52 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RONB vs. IUSG — Risk / Return Rank
RONB
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
IUSG
RONB vs. IUSG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Baron First Principles ETF (RONB) and iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF (IUSG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RONB | IUSG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.28 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.07 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 8.45 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RONB vs. IUSG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RONB drawdown since its inception was -13.08%, smaller than the maximum IUSG drawdown of -63.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RONB and IUSG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RONB | IUSG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.08% | -63.41% | +50.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -13.07% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -22.28% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -32.21% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -32.35% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.26% | -5.23% | -5.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.19% | -21.40% | +15.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.20% | — |
Volatility
RONB vs. IUSG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RONB | IUSG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 7.16% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 13.66% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.43% | 16.92% | +3.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.43% | 21.06% | -0.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.43% | 20.48% | -0.05% |
RONB vs. IUSG - Expense Ratio Comparison
RONB has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than IUSG's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
RONB vs. IUSG - Dividend Comparison
RONB has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IUSG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.50%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IUSG iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF | 0.50% | 0.53% | 0.59% | 1.12% | 1.07% | 0.59% | 0.93% | 1.64% | 1.32% | 1.28% | 1.48% | 1.29% |
RONB Baron First Principles ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RONB and IUSG have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IUSG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IUSG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for RONB.
IUSG has the higher dividend yield at 0.50%, compared with 0.00% for RONB.
They also come from different issuers: Baron Capital and iShares. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for RONB and 0.04% for IUSG.
Find the right allocation for RONB and IUSG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer