RONB vs. FCG
RONB (Baron First Principles ETF) and FCG (First Trust Natural Gas ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RONB is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Baron Capital, while FCG is a Energy Equities fund tracking the ISE-Revere Natural Gas Index. RONB is actively managed, while FCG is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.18, they often move in opposite directions. RONB charges 1.00%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for FCG.
Performance
RONB vs. FCG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RONB achieves a -3.75% return, which is significantly lower than FCG's 27.71% return.
RONB
- 1D
- -1.11%
- 1M
- 4.33%
- YTD
- -3.75%
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FCG
- 1D
- 1.02%
- 1M
- -6.03%
- YTD
- 27.71%
- 6M
- 20.12%
- 1Y
- 32.99%
- 3Y*
- 12.75%
- 5Y*
- 16.52%
- 10Y*
- 4.65%
RONB vs. FCG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
RONB Baron First Principles ETF | -3.75% | -0.33% |
FCG First Trust Natural Gas ETF | 27.71% | -1.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between RONB and FCG is -0.18, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2025 | -0.18 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RONB vs. FCG — Risk / Return Rank
RONB
FCG
RONB vs. FCG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Baron First Principles ETF (RONB) and First Trust Natural Gas ETF (FCG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RONB | FCG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.24 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.50 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.12 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.51 | -0.11 | -0.40 |
Drawdowns
RONB vs. FCG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RONB drawdown since its inception was -13.08%, smaller than the maximum FCG drawdown of -97.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RONB and FCG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RONB | FCG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.08% | -97.20% | +84.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -13.07% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -29.44% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -33.33% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -85.04% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.80% | -74.25% | +68.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.33% | -65.38% | +59.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 5.95% | — |
Volatility
RONB vs. FCG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RONB | FCG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 9.60% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 20.15% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.85% | 26.75% | -9.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.85% | 33.46% | -16.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.85% | 38.30% | -21.45% |
RONB vs. FCG - Expense Ratio Comparison
RONB has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than FCG's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
RONB vs. FCG - Dividend Comparison
RONB has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FCG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.15%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCG First Trust Natural Gas ETF | 2.15% | 2.86% | 2.76% | 3.25% | 3.04% | 1.73% | 3.82% | 2.87% | 1.46% | 1.56% | 1.70% | 4.79% |
RONB Baron First Principles ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RONB and FCG have a correlation of -0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FCG is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FCG is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for RONB.
FCG has the higher dividend yield at 2.15%, compared with 0.00% for RONB.
RONB is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while FCG is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: Baron Capital and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for RONB and 0.60% for FCG.
Find the right allocation for RONB and FCG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer