ROL vs. PEP

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

ROL (Rollins, Inc.) and PEP (PepsiCo, Inc.) are both stocks. ROL operates in Personal Services (Consumer Cyclical), while PEP operates in Beverages - Non-Alcoholic (Consumer Defensive). Over the past 10 years, ROL returned 14.86%/yr vs 6.41%/yr for PEP. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

ROL vs. PEP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Rollins, Inc. (ROL) and PepsiCo, Inc. (PEP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ROL achieves a -24.48% return, which is significantly lower than PEP's -0.18% return. Over the past 10 years, ROL has outperformed PEP with an annualized return of 14.86%, while PEP has yielded a comparatively lower 6.41% annualized return.

ROL

• 1D: -2.76%
• 1M: -17.50%
• YTD: -24.48%
• 6M: -25.57%
• 1Y: -22.16%
• 3Y*: 4.85%
• 5Y*: 7.75%
• 10Y*: 14.86%

PEP

• 1D: 0.34%
• 1M: -9.79%
• YTD: -0.18%
• 6M: -2.65%
• 1Y: 12.81%
• 3Y*: -5.36%
• 5Y*: 2.20%
• 10Y*: 6.41%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ROL vs. PEP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ROL Rollins, Inc.	-24.48%	31.06%	7.56%	21.19%	8.10%	-11.43%	78.47%	-6.95%	17.61%	39.61%
PEP PepsiCo, Inc.	-0.18%	-1.85%	-7.60%	-3.29%	6.78%	20.56%	11.67%	27.38%	-4.81%	17.82%

Correlation

The correlation between ROL and PEP is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.31
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.33
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.38
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.37
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 31, 1987	0.26

The correlation between ROL and PEP shifts across timeframes, from 0.26 (all time) to 0.38 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap ROL : $21.68B PEP : $194.68B
EPS ROL : $1.10 PEP : $6.37
PE Ratio ROL : 41.13 PEP : 22.28
PEG Ratio ROL : 3.72 PEP : 7.71
PS Ratio ROL : 5.66 PEP : 2.04
PB Ratio ROL : 15.69 PEP : 9.10
Total Revenue (TTM) ROL : $3.84B PEP : $95.45B
Gross Profit (TTM) ROL : $1.53B PEP : $51.60B
EBITDA (TTM) ROL : $859.94M PEP : $15.08B

Return for Risk

ROL vs. PEP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ROL

ROL Risk / Return Rank: 8
ROL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6
ROL Sortino Ratio Rank: 8
ROL Omega Ratio Rank: 8
ROL Calmar Ratio Rank: 16
ROL Martin Ratio Rank: 0

PEP

PEP Risk / Return Rank: 57
PEP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
PEP Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
PEP Omega Ratio Rank: 51
PEP Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
PEP Martin Ratio Rank: 61

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ROL vs. PEP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rollins, Inc. (ROL) and PepsiCo, Inc. (PEP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ROL	PEP	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.93	0.59	-1.52
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-1.19	1.07	-2.26
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.84	1.12	-0.28
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.66	0.76	-1.42
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-2.18	2.13	-4.31
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ROL vs. PEP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ROL Sharpe Ratio is -0.93, which is lower than the PEP Sharpe Ratio of 0.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ROL and PEP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ROL	PEP	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.93	0.59	-1.52
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.32	0.12	+0.20
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.60	0.33	+0.27
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.50	0.38	+0.12

Drawdowns

ROL vs. PEP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ROL drawdown since its inception was -57.27%, smaller than the maximum PEP drawdown of -73.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROL and PEP.

Drawdown Indicators

	ROL	PEP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-57.27%	-73.92%	+16.65%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-30.90%	-16.25%	-14.65%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-30.90%	-29.17%	-1.73%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-30.90%	-30.32%	-0.58%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-30.90%	-30.32%	-0.58%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-30.90%	-19.89%	-11.01%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.13%	-13.64%	+1.51%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	9.35%	5.79%	+3.56%

Volatility

ROL vs. PEP - Volatility Comparison

Rollins, Inc. (ROL) has a higher volatility of 7.92% compared to PepsiCo, Inc. (PEP) at 6.45%. This indicates that ROL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PEP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ROL	PEP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.92%	6.45%	+1.47%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.86%	14.91%	+3.95%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.99%	21.71%	+2.28%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.58%	18.38%	+6.20%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.03%	19.66%	+5.37%

Dividends

ROL vs. PEP - Dividend Comparison

ROL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.58%, less than PEP's 4.01% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PEP PepsiCo, Inc.	4.01%	3.92%	3.51%	2.91%	2.50%	2.45%	2.71%	2.77%	3.25%	2.64%	2.83%	2.76%
ROL Rollins, Inc.	1.58%	1.13%	1.33%	1.24%	1.18%	1.23%	0.84%	1.42%	1.03%	1.20%	1.18%	1.62%

Financials

ROL vs. PEP - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Rollins, Inc. and PepsiCo, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

ROL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rollins, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 906.42M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

PEP - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, PepsiCo, Inc. reported a gross profit of 10.73B and revenue of 19.44B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 55.2%.

ROL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rollins, Inc. reported an operating income of 145.49M and revenue of 906.42M, resulting in an operating margin of 16.1%.

PEP - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, PepsiCo, Inc. reported an operating income of 3.21B and revenue of 19.44B, resulting in an operating margin of 16.5%.

ROL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rollins, Inc. reported a net income of 107.84M and revenue of 906.42M, resulting in a net margin of 11.9%.

PEP - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, PepsiCo, Inc. reported a net income of 2.34B and revenue of 19.44B, resulting in a net margin of 12.0%.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ROL and PEP in my portfolio?

ROL and PEP have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ROL or PEP?

ROL has higher volatility (7.92%) compared to PEP (6.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ROL dropped -57.27% vs PEP's -73.92%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PEP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.59 vs -0.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.