ROL vs. AMZN
ROL (Rollins, Inc.) and AMZN (Amazon.com, Inc) are both stocks. Both are in the Consumer Cyclical sector — ROL in Personal Services, AMZN in Internet Retail. Over the past 10 years, ROL returned 15.58%/yr vs 20.83%/yr for AMZN. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ROL vs. AMZN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ROL achieves a -20.87% return, which is significantly lower than AMZN's 3.35% return. Over the past 10 years, ROL has underperformed AMZN with an annualized return of 15.58%, while AMZN has yielded a comparatively higher 20.83% annualized return.
ROL
- 1D
- 0.30%
- 1M
- -10.66%
- YTD
- -20.87%
- 6M
- -20.91%
- 1Y
- -16.61%
- 3Y*
- 6.26%
- 5Y*
- 8.61%
- 10Y*
- 15.58%
AMZN
- 1D
- -1.23%
- 1M
- -11.69%
- YTD
- 3.35%
- 6M
- 5.46%
- 1Y
- 11.87%
- 3Y*
- 23.49%
- 5Y*
- 7.35%
- 10Y*
- 20.83%
ROL vs. AMZN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ROL Rollins, Inc. | -20.87% | 31.06% | 7.56% | 21.19% | 8.10% | -11.43% | 78.47% | -6.95% | 17.61% | 39.61% |
AMZN Amazon.com, Inc | 3.35% | 5.21% | 44.39% | 80.88% | -49.62% | 2.38% | 76.26% | 23.03% | 28.43% | 55.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between ROL and AMZN is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 15, 1997 | 0.30 |
Over the past year, the correlation between ROL and AMZN has dropped to 0.01 - well below their long-term average of 0.30, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Fundamentals
ROL:
$22.72B
AMZN:
$2.59T
ROL:
$1.10
AMZN:
$8.37
ROL:
43.09
AMZN:
28.50
ROL:
3.90
AMZN:
0.69
ROL:
5.93
AMZN:
3.48
ROL:
16.44
AMZN:
5.87
ROL:
$3.84B
AMZN:
$742.78B
ROL:
$1.53B
AMZN:
$348.59B
ROL:
$859.94M
AMZN:
$152.71B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ROL vs. AMZN — Risk / Return Rank
ROL
AMZN
ROL vs. AMZN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rollins, Inc. (ROL) and Amazon.com, Inc (AMZN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ROL | AMZN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.58 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.89 | 1.09 | -0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.54 | 0.55 | -1.09 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.58 | 1.29 | -2.87 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ROL vs. AMZN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ROL drawdown since its inception was -57.27%, smaller than the maximum AMZN drawdown of -94.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROL and AMZN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ROL | AMZN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.27% | -94.40% | +37.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.90% | -21.74% | -9.16% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.90% | -30.88% | -0.02% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.90% | -56.15% | +25.25% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.90% | -56.15% | +25.25% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -27.60% | -13.25% | -14.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.14% | -28.19% | +16.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.53% | 9.21% | +1.32% |
Volatility
ROL vs. AMZN - Volatility Comparison
Rollins, Inc. (ROL) has a higher volatility of 9.24% compared to Amazon.com, Inc (AMZN) at 7.92%. This indicates that ROL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AMZN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ROL | AMZN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.24% | 7.92% | +1.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.67% | 20.73% | -2.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.16% | 30.13% | -5.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.59% | 35.53% | -10.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.04% | 32.48% | -7.44% |
Dividends
ROL vs. AMZN - Dividend Comparison
ROL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.51%, while AMZN has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMZN Amazon.com, Inc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ROL Rollins, Inc. | 1.51% | 1.13% | 1.33% | 1.24% | 1.18% | 1.23% | 0.84% | 1.42% | 1.03% | 1.20% | 1.18% | 1.62% |
Financials
ROL vs. AMZN - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Rollins, Inc. and Amazon.com, Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
ROL vs. AMZN - Profitability Comparison
ROL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rollins, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 906.42M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
AMZN - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Amazon.com, Inc reported a gross profit of 66.77B and revenue of 181.52B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.8%.
ROL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rollins, Inc. reported an operating income of 145.49M and revenue of 906.42M, resulting in an operating margin of 16.1%.
AMZN - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Amazon.com, Inc reported an operating income of 23.85B and revenue of 181.52B, resulting in an operating margin of 13.1%.
ROL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rollins, Inc. reported a net income of 107.84M and revenue of 906.42M, resulting in a net margin of 11.9%.
AMZN - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Amazon.com, Inc reported a net income of 30.26B and revenue of 181.52B, resulting in a net margin of 16.7%.
Frequently Asked Questions
ROL and AMZN have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ROL has higher volatility (9.24%) compared to AMZN (7.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ROL dropped -57.27% vs AMZN's -94.40%.
AMZN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.40 vs -0.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ROL and AMZN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer