ROKT vs. IFRA

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

ROKT (SPDR S&P Kensho Final Frontiers ETF) and IFRA (iShares U.S. Infrastructure ETF) are both Industrials Equities funds - ROKT tracks the S&P Kensho Final Frontiers Index while IFRA tracks the NYSE FactSet U.S. Infrastructure Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ROKT returned 24.68%/yr vs 13.03%/yr for IFRA. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ROKT charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for IFRA.

Performance

ROKT vs. IFRA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Kensho Final Frontiers ETF (ROKT) and iShares U.S. Infrastructure ETF (IFRA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ROKT achieves a 46.55% return, which is significantly higher than IFRA's 16.86% return.

ROKT

• 1D: -3.71%
• 1M: 12.62%
• YTD: 46.55%
• 6M: 60.20%
• 1Y: 111.37%
• 3Y*: 44.75%
• 5Y*: 24.68%
• 10Y*: —

IFRA

• 1D: 0.20%
• 1M: -1.29%
• YTD: 16.86%
• 6M: 16.28%
• 1Y: 28.44%
• 3Y*: 20.10%
• 5Y*: 13.03%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ROKT vs. IFRA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
ROKT SPDR S&P Kensho Final Frontiers ETF	46.55%	50.56%	27.89%	14.41%	-0.81%	4.63%	7.99%	40.90%	-13.20%
IFRA iShares U.S. Infrastructure ETF	16.86%	15.90%	17.02%	13.42%	-3.32%	29.81%	7.37%	27.00%	-7.82%

Correlation

The correlation between ROKT and IFRA is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.57
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.69
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.75
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2018	0.76

The correlation between ROKT and IFRA shifts across timeframes, from 0.57 (1 year) to 0.76 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

ROKT vs. IFRA - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ROKT	IFRA
Industrials	67.6%	39.4%
Technology	20.2%	-
Energy	6.4%	7.9%
Communication Services	5.9%	-
Basic Materials	-	14.7%
Consumer Cyclical	-	0.0%
Consumer Defensive	-	0.0%
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	37.7%

Return for Risk

ROKT vs. IFRA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ROKT

ROKT Risk / Return Rank: 93
ROKT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
ROKT Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
ROKT Omega Ratio Rank: 89
ROKT Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
ROKT Martin Ratio Rank: 96

IFRA

IFRA Risk / Return Rank: 60
IFRA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
IFRA Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
IFRA Omega Ratio Rank: 52
IFRA Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
IFRA Martin Ratio Rank: 68

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ROKT vs. IFRA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Kensho Final Frontiers ETF (ROKT) and iShares U.S. Infrastructure ETF (IFRA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ROKT	IFRA	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	3.88	1.94	+1.94
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	4.47	2.85	+1.62
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.57	1.33	+0.24
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	9.82	3.40	+6.42
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	35.81	12.70	+23.10
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ROKT vs. IFRA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ROKT Sharpe Ratio is 3.88, which is higher than the IFRA Sharpe Ratio of 1.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ROKT and IFRA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ROKT	IFRA	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.88	1.94	+1.94
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.09	0.73	+0.36
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.86	0.63	+0.23

Drawdowns

ROKT vs. IFRA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ROKT drawdown since its inception was -43.16%, which is greater than IFRA's maximum drawdown of -41.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROKT and IFRA.

Drawdown Indicators

	ROKT	IFRA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-43.16%	-41.06%	-2.10%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.40%	-8.40%	-3.00%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.46%	-19.93%	-3.53%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.46%	-19.93%	-3.53%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.82%	-2.66%	-6.16%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.75%	-5.14%	-1.61%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.12%	2.25%	+0.87%

Volatility

ROKT vs. IFRA - Volatility Comparison

SPDR S&P Kensho Final Frontiers ETF (ROKT) has a higher volatility of 13.10% compared to iShares U.S. Infrastructure ETF (IFRA) at 4.89%. This indicates that ROKT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IFRA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ROKT	IFRA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.10%	4.89%	+8.21%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	24.98%	11.32%	+13.66%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	28.89%	14.79%	+14.10%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.78%	17.92%	+4.86%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.14%	21.38%	+3.76%

ROKT vs. IFRA - Expense Ratio Comparison

ROKT has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than IFRA's 0.30% expense ratio.

Dividends

ROKT vs. IFRA - Dividend Comparison

ROKT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.27%, less than IFRA's 1.59% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
IFRA iShares U.S. Infrastructure ETF	1.59%	1.84%	1.75%	1.98%	1.98%	1.63%	2.08%	1.68%	2.50%
ROKT SPDR S&P Kensho Final Frontiers ETF	0.27%	0.41%	0.57%	0.62%	0.54%	1.79%	0.48%	0.74%	0.16%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ROKT and IFRA in my portfolio?

ROKT and IFRA have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ROKT or IFRA?

ROKT has higher volatility (13.10%) compared to IFRA (4.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ROKT dropped -43.16% vs IFRA's -41.06%.

Which ETF is better, ROKT or IFRA?

On 5-year performance, ROKT leads with 24.68% vs 13.03% for IFRA. On fees, IFRA is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, IFRA has been the lower-risk option at 4.89%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ROKT or IFRA?

Over the 5-year period, ROKT has performed better with a 24.68% return vs 13.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ROKT or IFRA?

IFRA is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for ROKT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ROKT or IFRA?

IFRA has the higher dividend yield at 1.59%, compared with 0.27% for ROKT.

What is the main difference between ROKT and IFRA?

ROKT tracks S&P Kensho Final Frontiers Index, while IFRA tracks NYSE FactSet U.S. Infrastructure Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for ROKT and 0.30% for IFRA.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ROKT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.88 vs 1.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.