ROGSX vs. WM
ROGSX (Red Oak Technology Select Fund) is Technology Equities fund managed by Oak Associates, while WM (Waste Management, Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, ROGSX returned 20.01%/yr vs 15.19%/yr for WM. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ROGSX vs. WM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ROGSX achieves a 16.36% return, which is significantly higher than WM's 0.43% return. Over the past 10 years, ROGSX has outperformed WM with an annualized return of 20.01%, while WM has yielded a comparatively lower 15.19% annualized return.
ROGSX
- 1D
- -1.10%
- 1M
- -0.31%
- YTD
- 16.36%
- 6M
- 15.07%
- 1Y
- 37.98%
- 3Y*
- 27.73%
- 5Y*
- 15.36%
- 10Y*
- 20.01%
WM
- 1D
- 2.59%
- 1M
- 0.87%
- YTD
- 0.43%
- 6M
- 0.15%
- 1Y
- -5.27%
- 3Y*
- 11.43%
- 5Y*
- 11.30%
- 10Y*
- 15.19%
ROGSX vs. WM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ROGSX Red Oak Technology Select Fund | 16.36% | 23.37% | 24.87% | 47.75% | -31.18% | 25.16% | 26.37% | 34.36% | 1.63% | 31.10% |
WM Waste Management, Inc. | 0.43% | 10.50% | 14.28% | 16.20% | -4.49% | 43.82% | 5.46% | 30.45% | 5.32% | 24.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between ROGSX and WM is -0.30, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.30 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 1999 | 0.35 |
The correlation between ROGSX and WM shifts across timeframes, from -0.30 (1 year) to 0.35 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ROGSX vs. WM — Risk / Return Rank
ROGSX
WM
ROGSX vs. WM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Red Oak Technology Select Fund (ROGSX) and Waste Management, Inc. (WM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ROGSX | WM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.27 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.78 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 0.97 | +0.37 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.71 | -0.32 | +3.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.17 | -0.68 | +9.85 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ROGSX vs. WM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ROGSX drawdown since its inception was -92.96%, which is greater than WM's maximum drawdown of -77.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROGSX and WM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ROGSX | WM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -92.96% | -77.85% | -15.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.51% | -16.70% | +2.19% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.76% | -18.14% | -6.62% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.03% | -18.14% | -17.89% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.03% | -30.07% | -5.96% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.14% | -10.49% | +6.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -51.52% | -17.68% | -33.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.28% | 7.73% | -3.45% |
Volatility
ROGSX vs. WM - Volatility Comparison
Red Oak Technology Select Fund (ROGSX) has a higher volatility of 8.18% compared to Waste Management, Inc. (WM) at 6.58%. This indicates that ROGSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ROGSX | WM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.18% | 6.58% | +1.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.40% | 14.22% | +1.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.72% | 19.24% | +0.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.12% | 18.65% | +4.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.58% | 19.57% | +3.01% |
Dividends
ROGSX vs. WM - Dividend Comparison
ROGSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.61%, more than WM's 1.62% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ROGSX Red Oak Technology Select Fund | 5.61% | 6.53% | 4.38% | 4.24% | 5.12% | 10.80% | 4.52% | 2.67% | 5.26% | 6.93% | 1.49% | 4.45% |
WM Waste Management, Inc. | 1.62% | 1.50% | 1.49% | 1.56% | 1.66% | 1.38% | 1.85% | 1.80% | 2.09% | 1.97% | 2.31% | 2.89% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ROGSX and WM have a correlation of -0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ROGSX has higher volatility (8.18%) compared to WM (6.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ROGSX dropped -92.96% vs WM's -77.85%.
ROGSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.00 vs -0.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ROGSX and WM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer