ROGSX vs. WM
ROGSX (Red Oak Technology Select Fund) is Technology Equities fund managed by Oak Associates, while WM (Waste Management, Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, ROGSX returned 19.31%/yr vs 15.74%/yr for WM. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ROGSX vs. WM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ROGSX achieves a 16.54% return, which is significantly higher than WM's 11.18% return. Over the past 10 years, ROGSX has outperformed WM with an annualized return of 19.31%, while WM has yielded a comparatively lower 15.74% annualized return.
ROGSX
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- 0.39%
- 6M
- 13.08%
- YTD
- 16.54%
- 1Y
- 28.87%
- 3Y*
- 25.72%
- 5Y*
- 14.79%
- 10Y*
- 19.31%
WM
- 1D
- 4.06%
- 1M
- 10.82%
- 6M
- 11.10%
- YTD
- 11.18%
- 1Y
- 8.98%
- 3Y*
- 14.77%
- 5Y*
- 12.43%
- 10Y*
- 15.74%
ROGSX vs. WM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ROGSX Red Oak Technology Select Fund | 16.54% | 23.37% | 24.87% | 47.75% | -31.18% | 25.16% | 26.37% | 34.36% | 1.63% | 31.10% |
WM Waste Management, Inc. | 11.18% | 10.50% | 14.28% | 16.20% | -4.49% | 43.82% | 5.46% | 30.45% | 5.32% | 24.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between ROGSX and WM is -0.35, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.35 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.06 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 1999 | 0.35 |
The correlation between ROGSX and WM shifts across timeframes, from -0.35 (1 year) to 0.34 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ROGSX vs. WM — Risk / Return Rank
ROGSX
WM
ROGSX vs. WM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Red Oak Technology Select Fund (ROGSX) and Waste Management, Inc. (WM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ROGSX | WM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.00 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.16 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.09 | +0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.03 | 0.54 | +1.49 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.54 | 1.15 | +5.39 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ROGSX vs. WM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ROGSX drawdown since its inception was -92.96%, which is greater than WM's maximum drawdown of -77.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROGSX and WM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ROGSX | WM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -92.96% | -77.85% | -15.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.51% | -16.70% | +2.19% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.76% | -18.14% | -6.62% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.03% | -18.14% | -17.89% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.03% | -30.07% | -5.96% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.99% | -0.91% | -3.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -51.41% | -17.66% | -33.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.50% | 7.83% | -3.33% |
Volatility
ROGSX vs. WM - Volatility Comparison
Red Oak Technology Select Fund (ROGSX) and Waste Management, Inc. (WM) have volatilities of 7.50% and 7.49%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ROGSX | WM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.50% | 7.49% | +0.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.27% | 15.45% | +0.82% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.38% | 19.98% | +0.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.26% | 18.89% | +4.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.57% | 19.67% | +2.90% |
Dividends
ROGSX vs. WM - Dividend Comparison
ROGSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.60%, more than WM's 1.46% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ROGSX Red Oak Technology Select Fund | 5.60% | 6.53% | 4.38% | 4.24% | 5.12% | 10.80% | 4.52% | 2.67% | 5.26% | 6.93% | 1.49% | 4.45% |
WM Waste Management, Inc. | 1.46% | 1.50% | 1.49% | 1.56% | 1.66% | 1.38% | 1.85% | 1.80% | 2.09% | 1.97% | 2.31% | 2.89% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ROGSX and WM have a correlation of -0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ROGSX has higher volatility (7.50%) compared to WM (7.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ROGSX dropped -92.96% vs WM's -77.85%.
ROGSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.45 vs 0.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ROGSX and WM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer