PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ROGSX vs. STK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ROGSX vs. STK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Red Oak Technology Select Fund (ROGSX) and Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Closed Fund (STK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ROGSX achieves a 21.39% return, which is significantly lower than STK's 59.80% return. Over the past 10 years, ROGSX has underperformed STK with an annualized return of 20.15%, while STK has yielded a comparatively higher 24.60% annualized return.


ROGSX

1D
0.58%
1M
10.90%
YTD
21.39%
6M
20.15%
1Y
47.84%
3Y*
29.95%
5Y*
16.94%
10Y*
20.15%

STK

1D
-0.19%
1M
17.70%
YTD
59.80%
6M
57.03%
1Y
116.50%
3Y*
37.51%
5Y*
22.04%
10Y*
24.60%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ROGSX vs. STK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ROGSX
Red Oak Technology Select Fund
21.39%23.37%24.87%47.75%-31.18%25.16%26.37%34.36%1.63%31.10%
STK
Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Closed Fund
59.80%24.85%17.74%46.60%-30.36%48.63%25.39%52.73%-14.91%33.52%

Correlation

The correlation between ROGSX and STK is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.79

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 30, 2009

0.68

The correlation between ROGSX and STK shifts across timeframes, from 0.68 (all time) to 0.82 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ROGSX vs. STK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ROGSX
ROGSX Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
ROGSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ROGSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
ROGSX Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
ROGSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
ROGSX Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

STK
STK Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
STK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
STK Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
STK Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
STK Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
STK Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ROGSX vs. STK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Red Oak Technology Select Fund (ROGSX) and Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Closed Fund (STK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ROGSXSTKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.42

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.53

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.80

-0.35

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.41

9.12

-5.71

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.88

38.55

-26.67

ROGSX vs. STK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ROGSX Sharpe Ratio is 2.69, which is lower than the STK Sharpe Ratio of 5.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ROGSX and STK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ROGSXSTKDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.69

5.11

-2.42

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

0.88

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.90

0.94

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.29

0.76

-0.47

Drawdowns

ROGSX vs. STK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ROGSX drawdown since its inception was -92.96%, which is greater than STK's maximum drawdown of -41.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROGSX and STK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ROGSXSTKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-92.96%

-41.74%

-51.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.51%

-12.84%

-1.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.76%

-26.59%

+1.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.03%

-36.27%

+0.24%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.03%

-41.74%

+5.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.19%

+0.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-51.61%

-7.41%

-44.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.16%

3.03%

+1.13%

Volatility

ROGSX vs. STK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Red Oak Technology Select Fund (ROGSX) is 4.78%, while Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Closed Fund (STK) has a volatility of 8.47%. This indicates that ROGSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than STK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ROGSXSTKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.78%

8.47%

-3.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.96%

18.91%

-4.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.40%

22.93%

-4.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.90%

25.10%

-2.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.46%

26.13%

-3.67%

ROGSX vs. STK - Expense Ratio Comparison

ROGSX has a 0.92% expense ratio, which is lower than STK's 1.26% expense ratio.


Dividends

ROGSX vs. STK - Dividend Comparison

ROGSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.38%, more than STK's 4.72% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ROGSX
Red Oak Technology Select Fund
5.38%6.53%4.38%4.24%5.12%10.80%4.52%2.67%5.26%6.93%1.49%4.45%
STK
Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Closed Fund
4.72%7.38%16.02%6.70%12.62%8.48%6.79%7.86%14.88%11.82%9.87%10.32%

Frequently Asked Questions


ROGSX and STK have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

STK has higher volatility (8.47%) compared to ROGSX (4.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ROGSX dropped -92.96% vs STK's -41.74%.

STK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.11 vs 2.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ROGSX and STK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer