PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ROG vs. NVS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ROG vs. NVS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Rogers Corporation (ROG) and Novartis AG (NVS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ROG achieves a 81.84% return, which is significantly higher than NVS's 11.31% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with ROG having a 10.65% annualized return and NVS not far ahead at 10.78%.


ROG

1D
2.35%
1M
23.22%
YTD
81.84%
6M
77.38%
1Y
148.56%
3Y*
1.93%
5Y*
-2.80%
10Y*
10.65%

NVS

1D
1.26%
1M
-2.03%
YTD
11.31%
6M
12.12%
1Y
32.56%
3Y*
17.94%
5Y*
14.22%
10Y*
10.78%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ROG vs. NVS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ROG
Rogers Corporation
81.84%-9.88%-23.06%10.67%-56.29%75.80%24.50%25.91%-38.82%110.81%
NVS
Novartis AG
11.31%46.95%0.02%16.14%8.06%-3.65%3.34%13.92%5.95%19.42%

Correlation

The correlation between ROG and NVS is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.15

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 1996

0.23

Fundamentals

EPS

ROG:

-$4.05

NVS:

$6.99

PS Ratio

ROG:

2.83

NVS:

5.14

Total Revenue (TTM)

ROG:

$813.20M

NVS:

$56.05B

Gross Profit (TTM)

ROG:

$256.80M

NVS:

$42.19B

EBITDA (TTM)

ROG:

$87.20M

NVS:

$22.40B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ROG vs. NVS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ROG
ROG Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
ROG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ROG Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
ROG Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
ROG Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
ROG Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

NVS
NVS Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
NVS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVS Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
NVS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVS Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ROG vs. NVS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rogers Corporation (ROG) and Novartis AG (NVS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ROGNVSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.52

1.27

+0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

10.38

2.59

+7.79

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

31.56

6.11

+25.45

ROG vs. NVS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ROG Sharpe Ratio is 3.86, which is higher than the NVS Sharpe Ratio of 1.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ROG and NVS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ROG vs. NVS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ROG drawdown since its inception was -83.13%, which is greater than NVS's maximum drawdown of -42.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROG and NVS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ROGNVSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-83.13%

-42.10%

-41.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.40%

-12.65%

-1.75%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-69.34%

-19.95%

-49.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-80.77%

-20.42%

-60.35%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-80.77%

-26.03%

-54.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-39.22%

-8.99%

-30.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-32.64%

-10.92%

-21.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.73%

5.34%

-0.61%

Volatility

ROG vs. NVS - Volatility Comparison

Rogers Corporation (ROG) has a higher volatility of 14.99% compared to Novartis AG (NVS) at 7.67%. This indicates that ROG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NVS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ROGNVSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.99%

7.67%

+7.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

27.70%

15.16%

+12.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

38.77%

21.05%

+17.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

40.15%

18.94%

+21.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

42.99%

19.66%

+23.33%

Dividends

ROG vs. NVS - Dividend Comparison

ROG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NVS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.20%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NVS
Novartis AG
3.20%2.90%3.84%3.44%3.70%3.86%3.22%3.03%3.47%3.24%3.73%3.10%
ROG
Rogers Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

ROG vs. NVS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Rogers Corporation and Novartis AG. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20222023202420252026
200.50M
13.52B
(ROG) Total Revenue
(NVS) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

ROG vs. NVS - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Rogers Corporation and Novartis AG over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
32.2%
74.4%
Portfolio components
ROG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rogers Corporation reported a gross profit of 64.60M and revenue of 200.50M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 32.2%.

NVS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Novartis AG reported a gross profit of 10.07B and revenue of 13.52B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 74.4%.

ROG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rogers Corporation reported an operating income of 10.70M and revenue of 200.50M, resulting in an operating margin of 5.3%.

NVS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Novartis AG reported an operating income of 4.24B and revenue of 13.52B, resulting in an operating margin of 31.3%.

ROG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rogers Corporation reported a net income of 4.50M and revenue of 200.50M, resulting in a net margin of 2.2%.

NVS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Novartis AG reported a net income of 3.16B and revenue of 13.52B, resulting in a net margin of 23.3%.


Frequently Asked Questions


ROG and NVS have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ROG has higher volatility (14.99%) compared to NVS (7.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ROG dropped -83.13% vs NVS's -42.10%.

ROG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.86 vs 1.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ROG and NVS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer