ROG vs. AEVA

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Rogers Corporation (ROG) and Aeva Technologies, Inc. (AEVA).

Performance

ROG vs. AEVA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Rogers Corporation (ROG) and Aeva Technologies, Inc. (AEVA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

ROG vs. AEVA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
ROG Rogers Corporation	17.21%	-9.88%	-23.06%	10.67%	-56.29%	75.80%	35.45%
AEVA Aeva Technologies, Inc.	-0.90%	179.58%	25.38%	-44.29%	-82.01%	-48.01%	47.61%

Fundamentals

EPS ROG : -$5.04 AEVA : -$2.60
PS Ratio ROG : 1.62 AEVA : 40.74
Total Revenue (TTM) ROG : $810.80M AEVA : $18.08M
Gross Profit (TTM) ROG : $256.80M AEVA : -$660.00K
EBITDA (TTM) ROG : $77.60M AEVA : $28.17M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ROG achieves a 17.21% return, which is significantly higher than AEVA's -0.90% return.

ROG

• 1D: 1.25%
• 1M: -0.46%
• YTD: 17.21%
• 6M: 33.40%
• 1Y: 58.94%
• 3Y*: -13.08%
• 5Y*: -11.04%
• 10Y*: 6.06%

AEVA

• 1D: 13.25%
• 1M: -0.75%
• YTD: -0.90%
• 6M: -9.24%
• 1Y: 88.00%
• 3Y*: 30.29%
• 5Y*: -26.73%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

ROG vs. AEVA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ROG

ROG Risk / Return Rank: 81
ROG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
ROG Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
ROG Omega Ratio Rank: 77
ROG Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
ROG Martin Ratio Rank: 86

AEVA

AEVA Risk / Return Rank: 68
AEVA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
AEVA Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
AEVA Omega Ratio Rank: 69
AEVA Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
AEVA Martin Ratio Rank: 60

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ROG vs. AEVA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rogers Corporation (ROG) and Aeva Technologies, Inc. (AEVA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ROG	AEVA	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.46	0.74	+0.71
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.96	1.77	+0.19
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.21	+0.05
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.43	1.27	+1.16
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	8.55	1.88	+6.67
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ROG vs. AEVA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ROG Sharpe Ratio is 1.46, which is higher than the AEVA Sharpe Ratio of 0.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ROG and AEVA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ROG	AEVA	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.46	0.74	+0.71
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.28	-0.28	0.00
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.14	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.06	-0.22	+0.27

Correlation

The correlation between ROG and AEVA is 0.26, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

ROG vs. AEVA - Dividend Comparison

Neither ROG nor AEVA has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

ROG vs. AEVA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ROG drawdown since its inception was -83.13%, smaller than the maximum AEVA drawdown of -97.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROG and AEVA.

Drawdown Indicators

	ROG	AEVA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-83.13%	-97.71%	+14.58%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-24.18%	-75.68%	+51.50%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-80.77%	-96.33%	+15.56%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-80.77%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-60.82%	-86.84%	+26.02%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-32.55%	-70.34%	+37.79%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.88%	51.15%	-44.27%

Volatility

ROG vs. AEVA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Rogers Corporation (ROG) is 10.71%, while Aeva Technologies, Inc. (AEVA) has a volatility of 30.85%. This indicates that ROG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AEVA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ROG	AEVA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.71%	30.85%	-20.14%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	25.05%	79.41%	-54.36%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	40.63%	119.11%	-78.48%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	39.52%	95.68%	-56.16%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	42.71%	90.50%	-47.79%

Financials