ROG vs. AEVA
ROG (Rogers Corporation) and AEVA (Aeva Technologies, Inc.) are both stocks. ROG operates in Electronic Components (Technology), while AEVA operates in Auto Parts (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 5 years, ROG returned -2.80%/yr vs -14.31%/yr for AEVA. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ROG vs. AEVA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ROG achieves a 81.84% return, which is significantly lower than AEVA's 90.29% return.
ROG
- 1D
- 2.35%
- 1M
- 23.22%
- YTD
- 81.84%
- 6M
- 77.38%
- 1Y
- 148.56%
- 3Y*
- 1.93%
- 5Y*
- -2.80%
- 10Y*
- 10.65%
AEVA
- 1D
- 3.61%
- 1M
- -0.20%
- YTD
- 90.29%
- 6M
- 70.97%
- 1Y
- 0.56%
- 3Y*
- 62.40%
- 5Y*
- -14.31%
- 10Y*
- —
ROG vs. AEVA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ROG Rogers Corporation | 81.84% | -9.88% | -23.06% | 10.67% | -56.29% | 75.80% | 30.39% |
AEVA Aeva Technologies, Inc. | 90.29% | 179.58% | 25.38% | -44.29% | -82.01% | -48.01% | 51.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between ROG and AEVA is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 27, 2020 | 0.26 |
Fundamentals
ROG:
-$4.05
AEVA:
-$2.52
ROG:
2.83
AEVA:
69.50
ROG:
$813.20M
AEVA:
$20.97M
ROG:
$256.80M
AEVA:
$971.00K
ROG:
$87.20M
AEVA:
$21.17M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ROG vs. AEVA — Risk / Return Rank
ROG
AEVA
ROG vs. AEVA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rogers Corporation (ROG) and Aeva Technologies, Inc. (AEVA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ROG | AEVA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.86 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.46 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.52 | 1.10 | +0.42 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 10.38 | 0.01 | +10.37 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 31.56 | 0.01 | +31.55 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ROG vs. AEVA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ROG drawdown since its inception was -83.13%, smaller than the maximum AEVA drawdown of -97.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROG and AEVA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ROG | AEVA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -83.13% | -97.71% | +14.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.40% | -75.68% | +61.28% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -69.34% | -75.68% | +6.34% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -80.77% | -96.01% | +15.24% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -80.77% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -39.22% | -74.73% | +35.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -32.64% | -70.66% | +38.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.73% | 56.32% | -51.59% |
Volatility
ROG vs. AEVA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Rogers Corporation (ROG) is 14.99%, while Aeva Technologies, Inc. (AEVA) has a volatility of 33.06%. This indicates that ROG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AEVA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ROG | AEVA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.99% | 33.06% | -18.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.70% | 77.76% | -50.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 38.77% | 114.68% | -75.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 40.15% | 97.11% | -56.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 42.99% | 91.31% | -48.32% |
Dividends
ROG vs. AEVA - Dividend Comparison
Neither ROG nor AEVA has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
ROG vs. AEVA - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Rogers Corporation and Aeva Technologies, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
ROG and AEVA have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AEVA has higher volatility (33.06%) compared to ROG (14.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ROG dropped -83.13% vs AEVA's -97.71%.
ROG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.86 vs 0.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ROG and AEVA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer