NVS vs. GSK
Compare and contrast key facts about Novartis AG (NVS) and GlaxoSmithKline plc (GSK).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: NVS or GSK.
Correlation
The correlation between NVS and GSK is 0.53, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
NVS vs. GSK - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
NVS:
-0.40
GSK:
-0.57
NVS:
-0.43
GSK:
-0.68
NVS:
0.94
GSK:
0.92
NVS:
-0.32
GSK:
-0.44
NVS:
-0.75
GSK:
-0.93
NVS:
8.61%
GSK:
13.53%
NVS:
16.26%
GSK:
22.07%
NVS:
-41.72%
GSK:
-55.21%
NVS:
-19.32%
GSK:
-25.45%
Fundamentals
NVS:
$198.53B
GSK:
$68.21B
NVS:
$5.72
GSK:
$1.48
NVS:
17.05
GSK:
22.59
NVS:
2.90
GSK:
0.77
NVS:
$37.51B
GSK:
$23.26B
NVS:
$27.93B
GSK:
$16.84B
NVS:
$15.56B
GSK:
$6.82B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NVS achieves a 0.23% return, which is significantly higher than GSK's -1.15% return. Over the past 10 years, NVS has outperformed GSK with an annualized return of 5.41%, while GSK has yielded a comparatively lower 2.05% annualized return.
NVS
0.23%
0.72%
-8.10%
-6.27%
5.71%
5.41%
GSK
-1.15%
-0.77%
-13.26%
-12.11%
-3.00%
2.05%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
NVS vs. GSK — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
NVS
GSK
NVS vs. GSK - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Novartis AG (NVS) and GlaxoSmithKline plc (GSK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
NVS vs. GSK - Dividend Comparison
NVS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.87%, less than GSK's 4.66% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NVS Novartis AG | 3.87% | 3.88% | 3.44% | 3.91% | 4.08% | 3.40% | 2.87% | 3.72% | 3.50% | 4.06% | 3.51% | 3.14% |
GSK GlaxoSmithKline plc | 4.66% | 4.60% | 3.75% | 4.78% | 4.92% | 5.49% | 4.28% | 5.55% | 5.72% | 7.06% | 5.96% | 6.09% |
Drawdowns
NVS vs. GSK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NVS drawdown since its inception was -41.72%, smaller than the maximum GSK drawdown of -55.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVS and GSK. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
NVS vs. GSK - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Novartis AG (NVS) is 4.22%, while GlaxoSmithKline plc (GSK) has a volatility of 5.97%. This indicates that NVS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GSK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
NVS vs. GSK - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Novartis AG and GlaxoSmithKline plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities