NVS vs. AMT
Compare and contrast key facts about Novartis AG (NVS) and American Tower Corporation (AMT).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: NVS or AMT.
Correlation
The correlation between NVS and AMT is 0.27, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
NVS vs. AMT - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
NVS:
0.66
AMT:
0.11
NVS:
1.02
AMT:
0.33
NVS:
1.13
AMT:
1.04
NVS:
0.57
AMT:
0.07
NVS:
1.28
AMT:
0.23
NVS:
8.94%
AMT:
12.36%
NVS:
17.23%
AMT:
25.69%
NVS:
-41.72%
AMT:
-98.70%
NVS:
-11.56%
AMT:
-31.19%
Fundamentals
NVS:
$211.16B
AMT:
$88.11B
NVS:
$5.87
AMT:
$4.15
NVS:
18.21
AMT:
45.44
NVS:
3.19
AMT:
1.18
NVS:
$51.07B
AMT:
$8.26B
NVS:
$38.17B
AMT:
$4.88B
NVS:
$20.75B
AMT:
$5.35B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NVS achieves a 9.87% return, which is significantly higher than AMT's 2.81% return. Over the past 10 years, NVS has underperformed AMT with an annualized return of 6.27%, while AMT has yielded a comparatively higher 9.44% annualized return.
NVS
9.87%
9.62%
-9.10%
8.06%
7.50%
6.27%
AMT
2.81%
-0.96%
-12.70%
3.47%
-2.75%
9.44%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
NVS vs. AMT — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
NVS
AMT
NVS vs. AMT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Novartis AG (NVS) and American Tower Corporation (AMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
NVS vs. AMT - Dividend Comparison
NVS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.53%, more than AMT's 3.44% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NVS Novartis AG | 3.53% | 3.88% | 3.44% | 3.91% | 4.08% | 3.40% | 2.87% | 3.72% | 3.50% | 4.06% | 3.51% | 3.14% |
AMT American Tower Corporation | 3.44% | 3.53% | 2.99% | 2.77% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 1.64% | 1.99% | 1.84% | 2.05% | 1.87% | 1.42% |
Drawdowns
NVS vs. AMT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NVS drawdown since its inception was -41.72%, smaller than the maximum AMT drawdown of -98.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVS and AMT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
NVS vs. AMT - Volatility Comparison
Novartis AG (NVS) has a higher volatility of 7.73% compared to American Tower Corporation (AMT) at 6.98%. This indicates that NVS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AMT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
NVS vs. AMT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Novartis AG and American Tower Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities