PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ROG vs. ^GSPC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

ROG vs. ^GSPC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Rogers Corporation (ROG) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ROG achieves a 34.84% return, which is significantly higher than ^GSPC's 9.41% return. Over the past 10 years, ROG has underperformed ^GSPC with an annualized return of 6.38%, while ^GSPC has yielded a comparatively higher 13.26% annualized return.


ROG

1D
1.09%
1M
-14.20%
6M
26.97%
YTD
34.84%
1Y
83.46%
3Y*
-9.59%
5Y*
-8.32%
10Y*
6.38%
ALL TIME*
7.28%

^GSPC

1D
0.70%
1M
0.09%
6M
7.94%
YTD
9.41%
1Y
20.07%
3Y*
17.84%
5Y*
11.25%
10Y*
13.26%
ALL TIME*
8.09%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$37.98T$37.61T$41.48T
$33.60M$34.55M$42.98M

ROG vs. ^GSPC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ROG
Rogers Corporation
34.84%-9.88%-23.06%10.67%-56.29%75.80%24.50%25.91%-38.82%110.81%
^GSPC
S&P 500 Index
9.41%16.39%23.31%24.23%-19.44%26.89%16.26%28.88%-6.24%19.42%

Correlation

The correlation between ROG and ^GSPC is 0.45, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.45

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.48

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.42

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 17, 1980

0.40

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ROG vs. ^GSPC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ROG
ROG Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
ROG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ROG Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
ROG Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
ROG Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
ROG Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

^GSPC
^GSPC Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
^GSPC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^GSPC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
^GSPC Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
^GSPC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
^GSPC Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ROG vs. ^GSPC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rogers Corporation (ROG) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ROG^GSPCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.74

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.79

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.25

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.95

2.00

+0.94

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.19

8.49

+3.70

ROG vs. ^GSPC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ROG Sharpe Ratio is 2.15, which is higher than the ^GSPC Sharpe Ratio of 1.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ROG and ^GSPC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ROG vs. ^GSPC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ROG drawdown since its inception was -83.13%, which is greater than ^GSPC's maximum drawdown of -56.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROG and ^GSPC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ROG^GSPCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-83.13%

-56.78%

-26.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-30.10%

-9.10%

-21.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-65.47%

-18.90%

-46.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-80.77%

-25.43%

-55.34%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-80.77%

-33.92%

-46.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-54.93%

-1.58%

-53.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-32.67%

-10.70%

-21.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.26%

2.14%

+5.12%

Volatility

ROG vs. ^GSPC - Volatility Comparison

Rogers Corporation (ROG) has a higher volatility of 16.06% compared to S&P 500 Index (^GSPC) at 3.51%. This indicates that ROG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ^GSPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ROG^GSPCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.06%

3.51%

+12.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

32.42%

10.11%

+22.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

41.27%

12.87%

+28.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

40.75%

17.01%

+23.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

43.21%

18.07%

+25.14%

Frequently Asked Questions


ROG and ^GSPC have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ROG has higher volatility (16.06%) compared to ^GSPC (3.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ROG dropped -83.13% vs ^GSPC's -56.78%.

ROG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs 1.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ROG and ^GSPC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer