ROE vs. MFVL

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF (ROE) and Motley Fool Value Factor ETF (MFVL).

ROE and MFVL are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ROE is an actively managed fund by Astoria. It was launched on Jul 31, 2023. MFVL is an actively managed fund by Motley Fool. It was launched on Dec 8, 2025.

Performance

ROE vs. MFVL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF (ROE) and Motley Fool Value Factor ETF (MFVL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

ROE vs. MFVL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
ROE Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF	0.75%	-0.14%
MFVL Motley Fool Value Factor ETF	-1.60%	1.39%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ROE achieves a 0.75% return, which is significantly higher than MFVL's -1.60% return.

ROE

• 1D: 2.75%
• 1M: -5.84%
• YTD: 0.75%
• 6M: 3.04%
• 1Y: 22.46%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MFVL

• 1D: 1.37%
• 1M: -5.21%
• YTD: -1.60%
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ROE vs. MFVL - Expense Ratio Comparison

ROE has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than MFVL's 0.50% expense ratio.

MFVL

Motley Fool Value Factor ETF

ROE

Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF

Return for Risk

ROE vs. MFVL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ROE

ROE Risk / Return Rank: 72
ROE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
ROE Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
ROE Omega Ratio Rank: 68
ROE Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
ROE Martin Ratio Rank: 82

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ROE vs. MFVL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF (ROE) and Motley Fool Value Factor ETF (MFVL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ROE	MFVL	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.18	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.74	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.91	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	9.05	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ROE	MFVL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.18	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.96	-0.07	+1.03

Correlation

The correlation between ROE and MFVL is 0.63, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

ROE vs. MFVL - Dividend Comparison

ROE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.13%, while MFVL has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023
ROE Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF	1.13%	0.97%	1.18%	0.68%
MFVL Motley Fool Value Factor ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

ROE vs. MFVL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ROE drawdown since its inception was -19.10%, which is greater than MFVL's maximum drawdown of -6.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROE and MFVL.

Drawdown Indicators

	ROE	MFVL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.10%	-6.49%	-12.61%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.22%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.15%	-5.21%	-0.94%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.70%	-1.41%	-1.29%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.58%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	ROE	MFVL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.80%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.31%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.18%	11.67%	+7.51%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.91%	11.67%	+4.24%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.91%	11.67%	+4.24%