PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RODM vs. VXUS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RODM vs. VXUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF (RODM) and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RODM achieves a 10.99% return, which is significantly lower than VXUS's 14.25% return. Over the past 10 years, RODM has underperformed VXUS with an annualized return of 8.89%, while VXUS has yielded a comparatively higher 9.76% annualized return.


RODM

1D
-0.22%
1M
1.13%
YTD
10.99%
6M
14.14%
1Y
25.48%
3Y*
20.42%
5Y*
9.57%
10Y*
8.89%

VXUS

1D
-0.99%
1M
4.68%
YTD
14.25%
6M
16.92%
1Y
32.01%
3Y*
19.30%
5Y*
8.46%
10Y*
9.76%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RODM vs. VXUS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RODM
Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF
10.99%34.42%8.02%15.76%-14.54%11.11%-0.62%17.15%-9.97%25.14%
VXUS
Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
14.25%32.35%5.08%15.86%-16.08%8.98%10.66%21.75%-14.43%27.46%

Correlation

The correlation between RODM and VXUS is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 27, 2015

0.86

The correlation between RODM and VXUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

RODM vs. VXUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
RODM
VXUS

Financial Services

25.9%
22.3%

Industrials

16.7%
16.1%

Technology

10.5%
18.1%

Healthcare

9.1%
7.1%

Energy

6.6%
5.2%

Basic Materials

6.3%
7.6%

Consumer Cyclical

5.9%
8.4%

Communication Services

5.5%
4.4%

Utilities

4.9%
3.2%

Consumer Defensive

4.1%
5.0%

Real Estate

3.6%
2.6%

Financial Services

RODM
25.9%
VXUS
22.3%

Industrials

RODM
16.7%
VXUS
16.1%

Technology

RODM
10.5%
VXUS
18.1%

Healthcare

RODM
9.1%
VXUS
7.1%

Energy

RODM
6.6%
VXUS
5.2%

Basic Materials

RODM
6.3%
VXUS
7.6%

Consumer Cyclical

RODM
5.9%
VXUS
8.4%

Communication Services

RODM
5.5%
VXUS
4.4%

Utilities

RODM
4.9%
VXUS
3.2%

Consumer Defensive

RODM
4.1%
VXUS
5.0%

Real Estate

RODM
3.6%
VXUS
2.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RODM vs. VXUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RODM
RODM Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
RODM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RODM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
RODM Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
RODM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
RODM Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

VXUS
VXUS Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
VXUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VXUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
VXUS Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
VXUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
VXUS Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RODM vs. VXUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF (RODM) and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RODMVXUSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.39

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.60

2.85

+0.75

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.50

11.14

+3.36

RODM vs. VXUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RODM Sharpe Ratio is 2.39, which is comparable to the VXUS Sharpe Ratio of 2.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RODM and VXUS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RODMVXUSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.39

2.12

+0.28

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

0.53

+0.19

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

0.57

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.52

0.39

+0.13

Drawdowns

RODM vs. VXUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RODM drawdown since its inception was -35.98%, roughly equal to the maximum VXUS drawdown of -35.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RODM and VXUS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RODMVXUSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.98%

-35.97%

-0.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.10%

-11.27%

+4.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.58%

-13.58%

+3.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.85%

-29.44%

+0.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.98%

-35.97%

-0.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.42%

-0.99%

-0.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.38%

-8.22%

+1.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.76%

2.88%

-1.12%

Volatility

RODM vs. VXUS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF (RODM) is 3.12%, while Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) has a volatility of 5.60%. This indicates that RODM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VXUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RODMVXUSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.12%

5.60%

-2.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.41%

13.00%

-4.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.74%

15.21%

-4.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.43%

16.05%

-2.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.24%

17.16%

-1.92%

RODM vs. VXUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

RODM has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than VXUS's 0.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

RODM vs. VXUS - Dividend Comparison

RODM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.80%, more than VXUS's 2.66% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RODM
Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF
2.80%3.11%4.09%4.42%3.81%4.41%2.82%2.82%2.03%2.24%3.19%2.60%
VXUS
Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
2.66%3.18%3.37%3.24%3.09%3.10%2.14%3.06%3.18%2.73%2.93%2.83%

Frequently Asked Questions


RODM and VXUS have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VXUS has higher volatility (5.60%) compared to RODM (3.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RODM dropped -35.98% vs VXUS's -35.97%.

On 10-year performance, VXUS leads with 9.76% vs 8.89% for RODM. On fees, VXUS is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, RODM has been the lower-risk option at 3.12%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VXUS has performed better with a 9.76% return vs 8.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VXUS is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for RODM.

RODM has the higher dividend yield at 2.80%, compared with 2.66% for VXUS.

RODM is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while VXUS is Global Equities. RODM tracks Hartford Risk-Optimized Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) Index, while VXUS tracks FTSE Global All Cap ex US Index. They also come from different issuers: Hartford and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for RODM and 0.05% for VXUS.

RODM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 2.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RODM and VXUS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer