PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RODM vs. VTV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RODM vs. VTV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF (RODM) and Vanguard Value ETF (VTV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RODM achieves a 11.64% return, which is significantly lower than VTV's 14.90% return. Over the past 10 years, RODM has underperformed VTV with an annualized return of 9.24%, while VTV has yielded a comparatively higher 12.81% annualized return.


RODM

1D
-0.53%
1M
0.90%
YTD
11.64%
6M
12.64%
1Y
25.47%
3Y*
19.57%
5Y*
9.73%
10Y*
9.24%

VTV

1D
0.53%
1M
5.60%
YTD
14.90%
6M
14.16%
1Y
28.57%
3Y*
18.04%
5Y*
12.12%
10Y*
12.81%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RODM vs. VTV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RODM
Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF
11.64%34.42%8.02%15.76%-14.54%11.11%-0.62%17.15%-9.97%25.14%
VTV
Vanguard Value ETF
14.90%15.27%15.95%9.32%-2.09%26.53%2.33%25.66%-5.47%17.15%

Correlation

The correlation between RODM and VTV is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.67

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 26, 2015

0.68

The correlation between RODM and VTV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.

RODM vs. VTV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
RODM
VTV

Financial Services

25.9%
22.3%

Industrials

16.6%
14.0%

Technology

10.8%
13.4%

Healthcare

8.9%
14.5%

Energy

6.8%
8.1%

Basic Materials

6.4%
3.1%

Consumer Cyclical

5.8%
4.0%

Communication Services

5.5%
3.3%

Utilities

4.9%
5.2%

Consumer Defensive

4.0%
9.4%

Real Estate

3.5%
2.8%

Financial Services

RODM
25.9%
VTV
22.3%

Industrials

RODM
16.6%
VTV
14.0%

Technology

RODM
10.8%
VTV
13.4%

Healthcare

RODM
8.9%
VTV
14.5%

Energy

RODM
6.8%
VTV
8.1%

Basic Materials

RODM
6.4%
VTV
3.1%

Consumer Cyclical

RODM
5.8%
VTV
4.0%

Communication Services

RODM
5.5%
VTV
3.3%

Utilities

RODM
4.9%
VTV
5.2%

Consumer Defensive

RODM
4.0%
VTV
9.4%

Real Estate

RODM
3.5%
VTV
2.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RODM vs. VTV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RODM
RODM Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
RODM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RODM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
RODM Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
RODM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
RODM Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

VTV
VTV Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
VTV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTV Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTV Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
VTV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTV Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RODM vs. VTV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF (RODM) and Vanguard Value ETF (VTV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RODMVTVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.45

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.68

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.50

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.60

4.52

-0.92

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.32

17.04

-2.72

RODM vs. VTV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RODM Sharpe Ratio is 2.33, which is comparable to the VTV Sharpe Ratio of 2.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RODM and VTV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RODM vs. VTV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RODM drawdown since its inception was -35.98%, smaller than the maximum VTV drawdown of -59.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RODM and VTV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RODMVTVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.98%

-59.27%

+23.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.10%

-6.35%

-0.75%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.58%

-14.52%

+3.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.85%

-17.04%

-11.81%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.98%

-36.78%

+0.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.84%

0.00%

-0.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.36%

-7.86%

+1.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.78%

1.68%

+0.10%

Volatility

RODM vs. VTV - Volatility Comparison

Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF (RODM) has a higher volatility of 3.58% compared to Vanguard Value ETF (VTV) at 3.35%. This indicates that RODM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RODMVTVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.58%

3.35%

+0.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.77%

7.80%

+0.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.01%

10.36%

+0.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.48%

13.93%

-0.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.22%

16.69%

-1.47%

RODM vs. VTV - Expense Ratio Comparison

RODM has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than VTV's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

RODM vs. VTV - Dividend Comparison

RODM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.78%, more than VTV's 1.82% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RODM
Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF
2.78%3.11%4.09%4.42%3.81%4.41%2.82%2.82%2.03%2.24%3.19%2.60%
VTV
Vanguard Value ETF
1.82%2.05%2.31%2.46%2.52%2.15%2.56%2.50%2.73%2.29%2.44%2.60%

Frequently Asked Questions


RODM and VTV have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RODM has higher volatility (3.58%) compared to VTV (3.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RODM dropped -35.98% vs VTV's -59.27%.

On 10-year performance, VTV leads with 12.81% vs 9.24% for RODM. On fees, VTV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, VTV has been the lower-risk option at 3.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VTV has performed better with a 12.81% return vs 9.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VTV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for RODM.

RODM has the higher dividend yield at 2.78%, compared with 1.82% for VTV.

RODM is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while VTV is Large Cap Value Equities. RODM tracks Hartford Risk-Optimized Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) Index, while VTV tracks CRSP US Large Cap Value Index. They also come from different issuers: Hartford and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for RODM and 0.04% for VTV.

VTV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.78 vs 2.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RODM and VTV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer