RODM vs. USMF
RODM (Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF) and USMF (WisdomTree US Multifactor Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - RODM is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the Hartford Risk-Optimized Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) Index, while USMF is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the WisdomTree US Multifactor Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, RODM returned 9.73%/yr vs 8.31%/yr for USMF. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RODM charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.28%/yr for USMF.
Performance
RODM vs. USMF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RODM achieves a 11.64% return, which is significantly higher than USMF's 6.65% return.
RODM
- 1D
- -0.53%
- 1M
- 0.90%
- YTD
- 11.64%
- 6M
- 12.64%
- 1Y
- 25.47%
- 3Y*
- 19.57%
- 5Y*
- 9.73%
- 10Y*
- 9.24%
USMF
- 1D
- 1.25%
- 1M
- 5.30%
- YTD
- 6.65%
- 6M
- 6.40%
- 1Y
- 9.68%
- 3Y*
- 13.99%
- 5Y*
- 8.31%
- 10Y*
- —
RODM vs. USMF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RODM Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF | 11.64% | 34.42% | 8.02% | 15.76% | -14.54% | 11.11% | -0.62% | 17.15% | -9.97% | 6.09% |
USMF WisdomTree US Multifactor Fund | 6.65% | 4.60% | 19.65% | 13.47% | -8.82% | 21.26% | 12.01% | 24.06% | -4.72% | 11.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between RODM and USMF is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 24, 2017 | 0.72 |
The correlation between RODM and USMF shifts across timeframes, from 0.54 (1 year) to 0.72 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
RODM vs. USMF - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
RODM
USMF
Financial Services
Industrials
Technology
Healthcare
Energy
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Financial Services
RODM
USMF
Industrials
RODM
USMF
Technology
RODM
USMF
Healthcare
RODM
USMF
Energy
RODM
USMF
Basic Materials
RODM
USMF
Consumer Cyclical
RODM
USMF
Communication Services
RODM
USMF
Utilities
RODM
USMF
Consumer Defensive
RODM
USMF
Real Estate
RODM
USMF
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RODM vs. USMF — Risk / Return Rank
RODM
USMF
RODM vs. USMF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF (RODM) and WisdomTree US Multifactor Fund (USMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RODM | USMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.47 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.97 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.15 | +0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.60 | 1.50 | +2.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.32 | 4.47 | +9.85 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RODM vs. USMF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RODM drawdown since its inception was -35.98%, roughly equal to the maximum USMF drawdown of -36.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RODM and USMF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RODM | USMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.98% | -36.24% | +0.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.10% | -6.47% | -0.63% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.58% | -15.39% | +4.81% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.85% | -18.10% | -10.75% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.98% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.84% | 0.00% | -0.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.36% | -4.15% | -2.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.78% | 2.17% | -0.39% |
Volatility
RODM vs. USMF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF (RODM) is 3.58%, while WisdomTree US Multifactor Fund (USMF) has a volatility of 4.10%. This indicates that RODM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than USMF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RODM | USMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.58% | 4.10% | -0.52% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.77% | 8.13% | +0.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.01% | 11.31% | -0.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.48% | 14.34% | -0.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.22% | 16.97% | -1.75% |
RODM vs. USMF - Expense Ratio Comparison
RODM has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than USMF's 0.28% expense ratio.
Dividends
RODM vs. USMF - Dividend Comparison
RODM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.78%, more than USMF's 1.29% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RODM Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF | 2.78% | 3.11% | 4.09% | 4.42% | 3.81% | 4.41% | 2.82% | 2.82% | 2.03% | 2.24% | 3.19% | 2.60% |
USMF WisdomTree US Multifactor Fund | 1.29% | 1.37% | 1.22% | 1.33% | 1.74% | 1.42% | 1.34% | 1.38% | 1.45% | 0.67% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RODM and USMF have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
USMF has higher volatility (4.10%) compared to RODM (3.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RODM dropped -35.98% vs USMF's -36.24%.
On 5-year performance, RODM leads with 9.73% vs 8.31% for USMF. On fees, USMF is cheaper at 0.28% per year. On volatility, RODM has been the lower-risk option at 3.58%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, RODM has performed better with a 9.73% return vs 8.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
USMF is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for RODM.
RODM has the higher dividend yield at 2.78%, compared with 1.29% for USMF.
RODM is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while USMF is Mid Cap Blend Equities. RODM tracks Hartford Risk-Optimized Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) Index, while USMF tracks WisdomTree US Multifactor Index. They also come from different issuers: Hartford and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for RODM and 0.28% for USMF.
RODM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 0.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RODM and USMF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer