PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RODM vs. PLTR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RODM vs. PLTR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF (RODM) and Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RODM achieves a 12.24% return, which is significantly higher than PLTR's -27.99% return.


RODM

1D
0.10%
1M
0.36%
YTD
12.24%
6M
13.78%
1Y
26.14%
3Y*
20.24%
5Y*
9.72%
10Y*
9.30%

PLTR

1D
-2.36%
1M
-4.48%
YTD
-27.99%
6M
-30.28%
1Y
-6.85%
3Y*
99.99%
5Y*
39.00%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RODM vs. PLTR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
RODM
Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF
12.24%34.42%8.02%15.76%-14.54%11.11%10.41%
PLTR
Palantir Technologies Inc.
-27.99%135.03%340.48%167.45%-64.74%-22.68%135.50%

Correlation

The correlation between RODM and PLTR is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.18

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.32

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2020

0.33

The correlation between RODM and PLTR shifts across timeframes, from 0.18 (1 year) to 0.37 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RODM vs. PLTR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RODM
RODM Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
RODM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RODM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
RODM Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
RODM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
RODM Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

PLTR
PLTR Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
PLTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PLTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
PLTR Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
PLTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
PLTR Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RODM vs. PLTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF (RODM) and Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RODMPLTRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.42

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.03

+0.39

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.58

-0.14

+3.72

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.22

-0.25

+14.47

RODM vs. PLTR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RODM Sharpe Ratio is 2.31, which is higher than the PLTR Sharpe Ratio of -0.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RODM and PLTR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RODM vs. PLTR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RODM drawdown since its inception was -35.98%, smaller than the maximum PLTR drawdown of -84.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RODM and PLTR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RODMPLTRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.98%

-84.62%

+48.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.10%

-38.22%

+31.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.58%

-40.61%

+30.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.85%

-79.14%

+50.29%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.31%

-38.22%

+37.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.37%

-40.27%

+33.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.78%

21.23%

-19.45%

Volatility

RODM vs. PLTR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF (RODM) is 3.54%, while Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR) has a volatility of 17.16%. This indicates that RODM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PLTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RODMPLTRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.54%

17.16%

-13.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.76%

38.32%

-29.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.02%

50.83%

-39.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.47%

65.44%

-51.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.21%

69.75%

-54.54%

Dividends

RODM vs. PLTR - Dividend Comparison

RODM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.77%, while PLTR has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PLTR
Palantir Technologies Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RODM
Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF
2.77%3.11%4.09%4.42%3.81%4.41%2.82%2.82%2.03%2.24%3.19%2.60%

Frequently Asked Questions


RODM and PLTR have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PLTR has higher volatility (17.16%) compared to RODM (3.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RODM dropped -35.98% vs PLTR's -84.62%.

RODM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.31 vs -0.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RODM and PLTR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer